Term papers writing service


The struggles of people with disabilities in todays society

By reviewing the main ideas of the social model of disability, this article presents the genesis of the concept of disability as a restriction of participation for disabled people, as adopted by the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, which Brazil ratified in 2008.

Disability - Social model of disability - Medical model of disability - Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Among the narratives of inequality that the struggles of people with disabilities in todays society expressed in the body, disability studies appeared as the late comers in the humanities and social sciences. Heirs to gender studies, feminists and anti-racists, the social model of disability proposed a redefinition of the meaning of living in a body that had been considered, for a long time, abnormal DINIZ, 2007, p.

As for sexism or racism, this new expression of oppression led to the creation of a neologism: Disablism is a result of the culture of normality, in which the impairments are the target of oppression and discrimination inserir nota 2.

Normality, which can either be understood as a biomedical expectation of standard functioning for the species or as a moral precept for productivity and adaptation to social norms, was challenged by the understanding that disability is not only a biomedical concept but a political one as well.

Disability expresses the oppression of the body with impairments: This change of the body with impairments from a medical problem to disability as oppression is challenging for the establishment of public and social policies DINIZ, 2007, p. Disability is not limited to a list of diseases and impairments that come from biomedical knowledge DINIZ et al. Disability is now considered to be the patterns of inequality that are imposed by environments with barriers on a body with impairments.

Therefore, the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities refers to participation as a parameter for the formulation of policies aimed at this population, defining people with disabilities as "those who have physical, intellectual or sensory impairments, which, in interaction with various barriers, may hinder their full and effective participation in society with others" UNITED NATIONS [UN], 2006a, Article 1.

Disability is not only what medical discourse describes but specifically the restriction of participation caused by social barriers. Brazil signed the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in 2008.

  • There were different levels in the debate, but one was particularly embodied by the text of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities;
  • Naturally, these reactions include disbelief and grief;
  • Programmatic Barriers Programmatic barriers limit the effective delivery of a public health or healthcare program for people with different types of impairments;
  • Education was available to people with disabilities for the first time in recorded Western history;
  • General hospitals in Britain are useless at looking after paraplegics and tetraplegics from a bodily-functions perspective if they have to stay in hospital following a serious operation.

This means a new concept of disability must guide political actions to ensure justice for this population. According to the 2000 Census, 14. The criteria used by the 2000 Census to calculate the size of the population with disability were markedly biomedical, such as difficulty in seeing, hearing, or moving.

This is due not only to the biomedical model currently in force in the planning and management of public policies for this population in Brazil but mainly due to the difficulty of measuring what is considered participation restriction by the interaction between the body and the social environment. The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities does not ignore the body, as it states "impairments of a physical, intellectual or sensory nature" UN, 2006a, Article 1.

It is the interaction between the impairments and the social barriers that restrict people's effective participation. According to the Convention, the new understanding of disability should not ignore the bodily impairments, nor is it restricted to listing them.

This redefinition of disability as a combination of a biomedical framework, which lists bodily impairments, and a human rights perspective, which denounces this type of oppression, was not a creation of the United Nations alone. For over four decades, the so-called social model of disability provoked the international political and academic debate on the failure of the biomedical concept of disability to promote equality between disabled and non-disabled people BARTON, 1998, p.

Common Barriers to Participation Experienced by People with Disabilities

The biomedical model of disability claims that there is a causal relationship between the impairments and the social disadvantages experienced by people with disabilities. This thesis was challenged by the social model, which not only challenged the medical power over bodily impairments but also showed how the body is not a destiny of exclusion BARNES et al, 2002 p. The social meaning attributed to these impairments is that they are a natural disadvantage, which historically meant that bodily impairments were seen as bad luck or personal tragedy BARNES et al, 2002, p.

If in the 19th century the biomedical model was a kind of redemption from religious narratives, which described impairments as the result of sin or divine wrath, today it is the biomedical authority which is being challenged by the social model of disability FOUCAULT, 2004, p. The criticism of medicalization suggests the inadequacy of the biomedical discourse to evaluate the participation constraints imposed by social environments with barriers.

Therefore, for the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, the disadvantage is not inherent to the body, but the result of values, attitudes and practices that discriminate against disabled people DINIZ et al, 2009, p. This paper demonstrates how disability studies reinforced the understanding of disability as a social disadvantage, challenging the biomedical narrative about what is normal and pathological.

  1. The money is what justifies, even sanctifies, this annual ritual of tears and guilt.
  2. Children's right to basic education including special needs education is also provided in the Children's Act 2001.
  3. Human beings can become impaired through physical, mental or sensory limitations; but that does not become a disability until that impairment stops them from participating in community life.
  4. Two and a half years ago, I spent 3 weeks in a spinal unit in Southport where I had my initial treatment 47 years previously.

Through a historical review of the main ideas of the social model of disability, the article draws a picture of the concept of disability as a restriction on participation. This was the concept adopted by the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, which was ratified by Brazil in 2008. The first way understands it as an expression of human diversity. A body with impairments belongs to someone who experiences impairments of a physical, intellectual, or sensory nature.

What is life really like for disabled people? The Disability Diaries reveal all

But the social barriers are the ones that, by ignoring the bodies with impairments, force the experience of inequality. Oppression is not an attribute of the impairment itself but the result of non-inclusive societies. The second way of understanding disability claims that it is a natural disadvantage, and efforts should be focused on repairing the impairments in order to ensure that all people can operate in a typical pattern for the species.

In this interpretative process, bodily impairments are classified as undesirable and not simply as a neutral expression of human diversity, as one must understand racial, generational, or gender diversity. The body with impairments should undergo a metamorphosis to normality, be it through rehabilitation, genetics, or educational practices. These two narratives are not mutually exclusive, although they point to different perspectives regarding the challenge posed by disability and human rights.

For the social model of disability, ensuring equality between people with and without disability should not be reduced to the supply of goods and biomedical services: Human rights have an important claim to universal validity, which is to return the responsibility for the inequalities to oppressive social constructions SEN, 2004.

This means that impairments acquire meaning only when converted into experiences through social interaction. Not everyone with impairments experiences discrimination, oppression, or inequality, because it is the relationship between the body and the society which produces disability DINIZ, 2007, p. The greater the social barriers, the greater the participation constraints imposed on disabled people. For the biomedical model of disability, a body with impairments should be the object of biomedical knowledge intervention.

Impairments are classified by medical narratives, which describe them as natural and undesirable disadvantages. Rehabilitation practices or healing are offered and even imposed on bodies in order to reverse or mitigate the signs of abnormality. The result is that the closer to the simulacra of normality, the greater the success of the medicalization of impairments THOMAS, 2002, the struggles of people with disabilities in todays society.

  • Hence, care was taken not to harm the physically handicapped;
  • With that in mind consider that in our supposedly advanced society, people with disabilities are subject to economic and social inequalities, violations of dignity and in some cases denied their very autonomy;
  • We saw lawyers, accountants, teachers and journalists with muscular dystrophy, receiving recognition as winners of Personal Achievement Awards;
  • As for sexism or racism, this new expression of oppression led to the creation of a neologism;
  • It meant not only being misunderstood, but being rudely mistreated;
  • The Universal Declaration of Human Rights , signed on 10 December 1948 supposedly expressed the baseline level of rights to which all human beings are entitled.

Educational practices comprise another universe for the taming of bodies: This was actually a controversy covered by the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, which recognizes the "facilitation of learning sign language and promotion of the linguistic identity of the deaf community" UN, 2006a, article 24, 3b. Disability has been understood as a personal or family destiny according to religious explanations, which was understood either as misfortune or as a blessing in almost all societies LAKSHMI, 2008.

The challenge of the mystical and religious narrative by the biomedical narrative was received as an important step towards ensuring equality BARTON, 1998, p. The origins of the barriers were no longer sin, guilt, or bad luck but genetics, embryology, degenerative diseases, traffic accidents, or aging. The biomedical narrative marked the dichotomy between normal and pathological since the impairments are only defined when contrasted with an ideal of the body without them.

The challenge now is to refute the description of a body with impairments as abnormal.

6 Instances of Discrimination People with Disabilities Face Every Day

Abnormality is an aesthetic judgment and, therefore, a moral value on life styles, not the result of a universal and absolute catalog about bodies DINIZ, 2007, p. The first generation of scholars defending the social model of disability was inspired by historical materialism and sought to explain oppression through the core values of capitalism, such as ideas of productive and functional bodies DINIZ, 2007, p.

Bodies with impairments would be useless to the productive rationale in an economic structure that is not open to diversity. The biomedical model, on the other hand, indicated that the experience of segregation, unemployment, low education, among many other expressions of inequality, was caused by the inability of the body with impairments to do productive work. Other approaches emerged in disability studies, but the social model has remained hegemonic.

This was how impairments came to be described as neutral bodily attributes, and disability has summarized the oppression and discrimination suffered by people living with impairments in environments with barriers.

By resisting the reduction of disability simply to impairments, the social model of disability offered new tools for social transformation and the guarantee of rights.

It was not biology that oppressed but the culture of normality, which described some bodies as undesirable. This change of interpretation on disability, shifting from the inequality of the body to social structures, had two implications.

The first was to undermine the authority of the corrective resources that biomedicine commonly offered as the only alternative for the well-being of people with disabilities. The second implication was that the social model opened analytical possibilities for a new description of the meaning of living in a body with impairments.

The private experience of being in a body with impairments caused a limited scope of care in the household, often condemning those with greater dependence to abandonment and institutionalization. By exposing the oppression of social structures, the social model showed that impairments are one of many ways of experiencing the body. The central thesis of the social model has enabled a shift of disability from private to public spaces.

  1. A recent initiative by the Federal Government, called the Draft Disability Standards for Education, further amends the DDA and increases the opportunities for students with disabilities to be educated in mainstream schools Commonwealth of Australia.
  2. Other approaches emerged in disability studies, but the social model has remained hegemonic. What is the role of the Paralympics when considering rehabilitation?
  3. Between 110-190 million adults have very significant difficulties in functioning. And in the two decades since then, the telethon doesn't seem to have changed much.
  4. It is no accident that these questions are emerging at the same time that the status of persons with disabilities in society is changing dramatically. As in studies of race and gender, biology and culture impose a permanent pendulum between what is defined as the fate of the body or the social oppression of the body.

This symbolic passage from the domestic to the public shook several biomedical assumptions about disability. It has been stated, for example, that disability is not abnormal, not being limited to stigma or shame because of difference. However goods and services are biomedical responses to health needs and are, therefore, universal demands. Unlike non-disabled people, impairments comprise lifestyles for those who experience them. Therefore, there are social model theorists that explore the idea of disability as an identity or community, like cultural identities LANE, 1997, p.

With the social model, disability came to be understood as an experience of inequality shared by people with different types of impairments: Just as there are a variety of bodies, there are a variety of ways to inhabit a body with impairments. It was by bringing the studies of disability and cultural studies together that the concept of oppression won argumentative legitimacy: The dichotomy normal and pathological, represented by the opposition of the body with and without impairments, opened way for a new strategy for political intervention, as envisaged by the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities UN, 2006a.

In addition to other forms of discrimination, the concept of discrimination in the Convention includes the denial of reasonable accommodation, which demonstrates the recognition of barriers as a preventable cause of inequalities experienced by disabled people. The centrality of the social model as a critique against capitalism was substituted by cultural studies, which distanced disability even more from biomedical authority over the body. It is also the culture of normality which oppresses the body with impairment and not only the economy DINIZ, 2007, p.

Social model theorists have offered evidence that to inhabit a body with impairments does not necessarily mean a sentence of segregation YOUNG, 1990, p. In the last two decades, the growth of population studies on aging strengthened the argumentative strategy of the social model of disability as a human rights issue: The ICF was approved in 2001 and anticipates the main political challenge of the the struggles of people with disabilities in todays society of disability proposed by the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Until the publication the struggles of people with disabilities in todays society the ICF, the WHO had adopted strictly biomedical language for the classification of bodily impairments, which is why the document is considered a milestone in the legitimization of the social model in the field of public health and human rights DINIZ, 2007, p.

The shift from the biomedical model to the social model of disability was the result of an extensive debate in the consultative stages of the ICF. In this interpretative model of disability, a body with impairments would experience restrictions that led to social disadvantage.

The disadvantage would be the result of impairments; therefore, the emphasis was on models of healing or rehabilitation. For nearly 30 years, the biomedical model of disability was sovereign in the actions of the WHO, which meant the hegemony of a language focused on the rehabilitation or cure of impairments in public policies in several countries.

There were different levels in the debate, but one was particularly embodied by the text of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: As in studies of race and gender, biology and culture impose a permanent pendulum between what is defined as the fate of the body or the social oppression of the body.

In feminist studies, the dichotomy between nature and culture was deconstructed in its own terms; the constitutive nature of sex to explain the existence of gender was ignored: A similar analytic turn was triggered in disability studies to face disablism, the ideology that oppresses a body with impairments.

Disability & The Injustice Facing over 1 Billion People

The first generation of the social model sustained that the body should be ignored, as its emergence would facilitate the biomedical understanding of disability as a personal tragedy DINIZ, 2007, p.

Adopting this posture, the study of aspects of the body with impairments, such as pain, addiction, dependency, or weaknesses would be to surrender to the concept of biomedical control of disability as a deviation or abnormality WENDELL, 1996, p.

10 facts on disability

The result was the silencing of the body as an instance of habitability, and as a locus in which to describe disabilities. The semblance of normality for all bodies set the tone of the debates and political struggles of the 1970s for the social model. But the silence was challenged by the emergence of other perspectives into the social model, especially feminism.