Term papers writing service


The conflict between the capulet and montague families in the play romeo and juliet

Those of us who believe in fate could say that it was merely unfortunate destiny that was responsible for the deaths of Romeo and Juliet. A power or force held to predetermine events that are going to happen no matter what.

For others though, that idea is not convincing enough. So we look to the major and minor flaws of the play for a better understanding.

Could it have been unfortunate accidents? Or differences in character personalities? Or simply lack of communication throughout the play? I do not believe that it was any one of these, but that it was a combination of them all working together that lead to Romeo and Juliet's tragic deaths.

Romeo and Juliet

At the beginning of the play we see an ongoing feud between two families that engulfed the entire city of Verona and made it so that there was constant tension. This gives us insight to the continuous conflict that will persist throughout the play. Nearly every character in the play had a flaw or action that could have contributed to Romeo and Juliet's death. The major causes for the deaths of Romeo and Juliet were flaws in the main characters and the problems that these flaws caused for the young lovers: For others such as myself, this idea is simply not convincing enough.

Rather, the major causes for the deaths of Romeo and Juliet lie in flaws in the characters and the effects of these flaws on Romeo and Juliet Thesis. Reading this play for the first time, I was shocked at how many of its characters wish to continue fighting a feud whose origin is forgotten 1st Main Point. At the very opening of the play, for example, servants of the Capulet household start a fight with servants of the Montagues.

Taunting Abram of the house of Montague with an obscene gesture "Do you bite you thumb at us, sir? By the end the two star-crossed lovers of Romeo and Juliet are dead.

  • Mercutio spurs Tybalt on with a battle of words, while Benvolio tries to convince Tybalt to settle this matter peacefully;
  • Mercutio then begins one of the most famous speeches from any Shakespeare play when he begins speaking about Queen Mab;
  • Lady Capulet tells Juliet that Paris will be at the party tonight, and that he would make a fine husband.

The three major flaws or decencies; pride, violence, and communication could be the foundation to several minor flaws in the existing characters, their relations with each other, and the environment of this play, that would account for the tragic deaths of the two lovers Romeo and Juliet. Romeo and Juliet, written by William Shakespeare, is a fiction about a tragic Platonic love.

I think Shakespeare really likes and enjoys making serious conflicts, matters, and difficult situations. In this tragic play, all the flaws that caused the problems are the author's intention or his purpose to create such a tragedy.

It is not the "stars" or the fate that account for the deaths of Romeo and Juliet, but the play itself that reveals the author's motives to create conflicts. The major flaws that account for the tragic deaths of Romeo and Juliet are the family feud between Capulet and Montague, and the lack of communication between the major characters.

These flaws eventually bring a blindness that causes problems after problems. Also, these deficiencies are Shakespeare's scheme to make this play fascinating and moving. By the end of Romeo and Juliet, the two star-crossed lovers are dead. A number of flaws contributed to their deaths, but the major ones were individual pride and arrogance, violence that pervaded Verona, and lack of communication between family members.

At the beginning of Romeo and Juliet, the two young lovers fall in love at the Capulet ball, court each other in the moonlight, and are married the next day. And yet, by the end of the play, Romeo and Juliet are dead; the only cold comfort is that their deaths have brought about what the Prince calls "a glooming peace" to their two families. But who or what is responsible for their deaths?

It is not the "stars" or fate that brought about this play's tragic ending, but personal flaws that brought about the play's tragic ending. To start with, Romeo was a mooning adolescent who was fickle when it came to the girls he fell in love with.

In Romeo and Juliet, why are Capulet and Montague fighting?

When he was first in love with Rosaline he walked through the streets mooning over her, and he would often sit under a tree west of the city thinking of her. An example of his attitude about love is in 1. Alas that love, whose view is muffled still, Should without eyes see pathways to his will!

Where shall we dine? What fray was here? Yet tell me not, for I have heard it all. Here's much to do with hate, but more with love. Why then, O brawling love, O loving hate, O anything, of nothing first create! This love feel I, that feel no love in this. Dost thou not laugh? Like any mooning adolescent, Romeo exaggerates his feelings, calling out "alas" and "O me" to his friend Benvolio, then in the next breath asking "where shall we dine," and in the next bemoaning the "brawling love.

Shakespeare begins the play with one of the most major flaws, violence. He opens the play with the servants of the two households, the Capulets and the Montagues, taunting and fighting with each other over their name. Was it that the servants, or was it that the whole atmosphere of the town of Verona, itself was violent?

The townsfolk themselves blood-thirsty to see a fight, and a prince that lacks authority to prevent it from happening. Until he exiles Romeo for the death of Tybalt, after Tybalt slain Mercutio.

It has been said throughout time that it is in human nature to be violent. The major flaw that contributed to the deaths of Romeo and Juliet was a love of violence: Violence pervades the city, plagues the Capulet and Montague families, and ultimately causes the deaths of Mercutio and Tybalt.

At the very beginning of the play, for instance, violence threatens to engulf the whole city of Verona. Sampson, a servant of the Capulets, starts a fight with Abram, a Montague servant, by obscenely biting his thumb at him. With that, shouting "Strike! Down with the Capulets! Down with the Montagues 1. As if to emphasize the fact that the violence stems from the Capulet and Montague family feud, it is the heads of the two families who now join in the fight.

By Act 5, scene 5 of the play, Romeo and Juliet have met their fated demise. The "star-crossed" love of the two youths has been brought to an abrupt end. But can it all be blamed on fate? It is clear to me that the error is truly in the hand of Tybalt, with his penchant for hostility; Lady Capulet, having remained cold and distant, not forming a relationship of any sort with her daughter; and finally, Friar Lawrence, his arrogance somehow fooling him into believing that he alone had the power to end a family feud that had been brewing for years.

Let's start with Tybalt. Tybalt is a hateful instigator whose hostility leads not only to the deaths of Romeo and Juliet, but to that of Mercutio as well and eventually, his own. While others are trying desperately to calm the situation, Tybalt is always the first to step in and bring it back to a fury.

In response to Benvolio's attempt to bring the very first altercation of the play to a stop, Tybalt replies, " talk of peace? I hate the word, as I hate hell, all Montagues, and thee" 1.

  1. The major causes for the deaths of Romeo and Juliet were flaws in the main characters and the problems that these flaws caused for the young lovers. Benvolio persuades Romeo to go to the party to get his mind off Rosaline.
  2. A number of flaws contributed to their deaths, but the major ones were individual pride and arrogance, violence that pervaded Verona, and lack of communication between family members. Hours after stating marriage was not something she ever intended to do, Juliet sees Romeo and it's love at first sight.
  3. Lady Capulet tells Juliet that Paris will be at the party tonight, and that he would make a fine husband.
  4. Act IV, Scene iii Juliet tells her mother and the Nurse that she does not need any more help and that she wishes to be left alone. Capulet and Montague shake hands and end the feud that caused so many innocent people to die.

He refuses to "endure" 1. The final straw comes when Romeo, just married, is greeted by Tybalt with, "Romeo, the love I bear thee can afford no better term than this: Romeo tries to ignore it, not able to explain why he refuses to defend himself; this causes Mercutio to step up instead, which leads to his death.

  1. Friar Lawrence tries to talk some sense into Romeo by reminding him that he could have been murdered for his actions. He hopes that in uniting the young lovers in marriage, he will bring the feuding families together and stop the senseless violence being caused by the feud.
  2. At the light of day, Romeo is to flee to Mantua, where he will wait until Friar Lawrence can put an end to the familial feuds. He takes great joy in fighting, especially when he fights with the hated Montagues and of course Romeo.
  3. Ever the melancholy one, Romeo replies that he is too depressed to dance. Romeo, of course, is guilty of this haste as well, having just moments before also committed suicide.
  4. Rather, the major causes for the deaths of Romeo and Juliet lie in flaws in the characters and the effects of these flaws on Romeo and Juliet Thesis.
  5. Juliet tries to plea with her mother, but Lady Capulet will not listen. He asks to receive his rightful blame, but the Prince says that they cannot condemn a holy man.

Then Romeo is forced to reciprocate with the murder of Tybalt. Romeo is thus banished and then the plot resulting in the deaths of our lovers emerges. Lady Capulet could have stopped all this. Were she more of a mother to Juliet, instead of merely the body that carried her for nine months, Juliet may not have felt that Friar Lawrence's plan was her only option.

Were she less cold and insensitive, she and Lord Capulet would have had a better relationship as well, and she would have been able to step in on Juliet's behalf when she knew full well that Juliet was not content to marry Paris.

But she didn't know, did she? No, Lady Capulet was so distant from her daughter that she brought the news of her coming marriage as "joyful tidings" 3.

  • Romeo has no interest in his family's feud with the Capulets;
  • That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet;
  • Capulet tells Lady Capulet to tell Juliet the good news before she goes to sleep;
  • To believe that the events of that day in Romeo's life were actually positive is to be a bit simple-minded;
  • He climbs over the wall and into the orchard while his friends taunt him from the other side.

What mother would be so callous as to chastise her daughter for grieving at the loss of a close family member and then expect her so quickly to move onto happier thoughts of an upcoming unwanted marriage? I wish my mother and I were so close. The final character who could have certainly stopped the deaths of Romeo and Juliet is Friar Lawrence. This man, whom the two teens both trusted very much, was so arrogant as to think that he alone could with this one plot and this perfect love bring to an end the feud of the tow families that had been battling for years.

How irresponsible to take the trust that they had in him as an elder and a man of god to know the right thing for them to do, and use it to attempt to gain the credit for the end of the feud. The Zeffirelli film portrays it all so clearly, as the Friar reaches the steps and after just chastising Romeo for the way that he jumped into situations, and as he spots the cross, the Friar's eyes light up and you see him realize that he has the power with "this alliance may so happy prove to turn your households rancor to pure love" 2.

This arrogance only continues after Romeo has been banished and the friar advises him to leave for Mantua while the Friar will have the chance "to blaze your marriage, reconcile your friends, beg pardon of the Prince, and call thee back with twenty thousand times more joy than thou went'st forth in lamentation" 3.

To think that he could within a couple of weeks after Romeo was gone just apologize here and ask forgiveness there, and whoops-a-daisy, Romeo is welcomed back to Verona with a parade to boot, this is just ridiculous. But Romeo and Juliet trusted the Friar, trusted his judgment.

And Juliet should have been able to confide in her mother. And Tybalt should have been able to count to ten and walk away. But then we would not have the most famous of Shakespeare's tragedies. The two hours traffic of the stage, fearful passage of death-marked love. But then, what's love go to do with it? The Commonality of Deficiency The haunting quality of this play comes from the fact that the tragedy results from a series of what seem like coincidences. If only Romeo and Juliet's families had not been enemies; if only Lord Capulet had not decided at that moment to quickly marry off Juliet to Paris; if only Friar John had not been quarantined; if only Romeo had waited just a little longer before swallowing the fatal poison.

But these driving forces of the play are not mere twists of fate. In reality, they are due to the character deficiencies of most of the characters, but primarily Mercutio, Capulet, Friar Lawrence and, of course, Romeo and Juliet, and they are what propel the story to its inevitable ending.

His primary shortcoming is his egotism, The brazen bravado he displays when he eggs on Tybalt, who ends up inflicting the fatal stab wound, is reflected in his final speech, when he refuses to let the gathered crowds see him die. Even in his last moments, he looks for a laugh, punning, "Ask for me tomorrow, and you shall find me a grave man" 3. This exaggerated sense of self serves as fuel for the fire of hatred: Since he cannot bear for his side to lose, he encourages the fighting between the families, and makes each fight into a battle for glory.