Term papers writing service


Compare and contrast pride and prejudice book and movie

Sparks fly when spirited Elizabeth Bennet meets single, rich, and proud Mr. Darcy reluctantly finds himself falling in love with a woman beneath his class. Can each overcome their own pride and prejudice?

Synopsis from IMDb Review: Originally published in 1813, Pride and Prejudice,a novel about manners, deals with the issues of upbringing, morality, education, and marriage amongst the landed gentry of Regency Britain.

The book remains one of the most popular English language novels, with over 20 million copies sold. Due to this continual popularity, Pride and Prejudice has received a cinematic adaptation numerous times. Jane, Elizabeth, Mary, Kitty, and Lydia.

The story begins immediately after the eligible and wealthy bachelor Mr.

Comparing movies to the books they're based off

Bingley rents the large estate in the area. Bingley brings his two sisters and his status-obsessed friend, Mr. Darcy, along with him.

Austen uses these characters to explore five different types of relationships: Bingley and the idealistic Jane; the prideful Mr. Darcy and the prejudiced Elizabeth; the flighty Lydia and the conniving Wickham; the obsequious Mr.

Comparing the Book to the Movie

Collins and the unlucky Charlotte; the hysterical Mrs. Bennet and caustic Mr. All these relationships illustrate what a marriage should and should not resemble. In this world, social standing and wealth do not necessarily translate into success and stability.

Darcy attempts to always act in a principled and honorable manner, but he comes across as proud and overbearing. The mini-series is a direct adaption of the novel, nearly all the dialogue comes straight from the book. In 2005, director Joe Wright decided to bring Pride and Prejudice to the big screen.

The last straight movie adaption was the 1940 version starring Greer Garson and Sir Laurence Olivier. The 2005 version was adapted by Deborah Moggach and Emma Thompson did some uncredited edits on the dialogue. This resulted in the most abridged cinematic version ever produced. Wright made several drastic changes that I vehemently dislike.

This version takes place in the late 18th century, while the novel occurs in the 19th century.

Musings on Books and movies

While 18th century clothing makes more of an impact, the time period did not require changing. What aggravates me the most is the stark societal differences between the Bennet family and Darcy. In the book, the Bennets are landed gentry with an entailed estate, this does not mean they suffered economically.

Since Mr Bennet had no sons, the estate goes to the closest male relative upon his death. In the movie depiction the clothing, furnishing, and mannerisms of the Bennet clan more closely resembles those of the working class instead of the landed gentry. At least not the main house, if the kitchen was in an outer house than a pig running through it would be more plausible. Nearly all aristocratic families employed butlers, the family would never answer the door themselves.

  • Conclusion The 2005 movie adaptation of Pride and Prejudice can be viewed in different contrasting perspectives;
  • Mary comments on the dance to Elizabeth.

The societal differences, as depicted in the movie, are so stark that Darcy actually marrying Elizabeth borders on unbelievable. Other characters besides Darcy received a personality re-write for the film. Bingley comes across as a bumbling fool without a single original thought. Darcy would never befriend such an empty-headed individual.

Perhaps the gravest mistake lies in the portrayal of Elizabeth. This version of Elizabeth is pouty, rude, defiant, and flighty. This radical change alters the poignancy of the narrative. The movie places most of the characters in unbelievable situations. If Jane wore appropriate clothing and Elizabeth was in the room, then it would have verged on acceptable. Elizabeth, or any women of aristocratic birth, would never wear them hair down while visiting an estate like Netherfield Park.

A proper lady never went out in public without an acceptable hair style, which usually meant an up-do at this point in time. In the book Elizabeth acutely knows the social rules and strives to uphold them at all times. Darcy controls a vast estate and moves in exalted circles. He would speak in a clipped and refined manner. The absolute worst scene in the movie occurs when Darcy declares his love to Elizabeth with a fake stutter.

Little to no emotion shows in his voice and the effect is not romantic. While MacFayden certainly possesses the looks to play Mr Darcy, his delivery did not do the role justice. Part of this fault lies in the hands of the screenwriter who managed to take a thought provoking romance and turn it into a historical costumed rom-com.

This version of Darcy felt too modern and lacked the reservedness depicted in the book. In the book Lydia compare and contrast pride and prejudice book and movie away with Wickham, a calvalry officer with a chequered past.

Wickham grew up with Darcy and attempted to pull a similar stunt with Georgiana Darcy. Thankfully, Darcy kept Wickham away from her before it was too late. When Darcy heard that Wickham ran off with Lydia with no intention of marrying her, he took off to find them and force Wickham to do the honorable thing. Darcy only did this in order to prove to Elizabeth that he truly cared about her. This one subplot brings together Darcy and Elizabeth in a believable manner and wipes away their preconceived prejudices regarding each other.

Without this subplot, Darcy does not have a chance to show his true character to Elizbeth and she does not get to see him in a new light.

  • His relationship with his wife is much more loving in the movie;
  • Bennet walks away angrily when Elizabeth comes to introduce Wickham to Mrs;
  • The mini-series is a direct adaption of the novel, nearly all the dialogue comes straight from the book;
  • In my opinion, this book would be a dream to make into a big budget film because there is so much material to work with, thus giving a high degree artistic license to the film maker.

I could have forgiven all the other changes if Wright left this one plot point in the film. Without it, the movie is a pale version of the original narrative.