Term papers writing service


The clean air act vs pollution essay

Hire Writer Chrysler is an American automobile manufacture, one of the big three American automobile manufacturers. It sells vehicles worldwide such as their Chrysler brand, Dodge, Jeep and Ram brands. Chrysler was hit by the automotive industry crisis of 2008-2010, which received billions of dollars in loans from the United States government. The values of sustainability guide our decisions and actions as we strive to build a more secure future for our employees, customers, suppliers, dealers and society as a whole.

Their results are greater fuel efficiency and reduced emissions, while achieving the economies of scale necessary for long-term viability.

Clean Air Act Essay

Why did the law come about? In October 1948 in Donora Pennsylvania a cloud of air pollution was formed and lingered for five days In October 1948, a thick cloud of air pollution formed above the industrial town of Donora, Pennsylvania.

Events like these alerted us to the dangers that air pollution poses to public health. Several federal and state laws were passed, including the original Clean Air Act of 1963, which established funding for the study and the cleanup of air pollution.

But there was no comprehensive federal response to address air pollution until Congress passed a much stronger Clean Air Act in 1970. That same year Congress created the EPA and gave it the primary role in carrying out the law. In 1990, Congress dramatically revised and expanded the Clean Air Act, providing EPA even broader authority to implement and enforce regulations reducing air pollutant emissions.

  • In 1990, Congress dramatically revised and expanded the Clean Air Act, providing EPA even broader authority to implement and enforce regulations reducing air pollutant emissions;
  • Hill, president of the 725,000-member International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, appreciates the hazards, but said in a May 16 statement that unless utilities were given an extra five or six years to modernize or close their oldest coal plants, about 50,000 workers in power, mining, and railroads would lose their jobs;
  • Their results are greater fuel efficiency and reduced emissions, while achieving the economies of scale necessary for long-term viability;
  • The values of sustainability guide our decisions and actions as we strive to build a more secure future for our employees, customers, suppliers, dealers and society as a whole;
  • Chrysler was hit by the automotive industry crisis of 2008-2010, which received billions of dollars in loans from the United States government;
  • Why did the law come about?

The 1990 Amendments also placed an increased emphasis on more cost-effective approaches to reduce air pollution. How the law has impacted your corporation?

  • The Clean Air Act can serve as a goad to generating better jobs in more innovative technologies—and as a mechanism to reduce health-care costs;
  • What are the benefits of the law-who has the law helped?

What are the benefits of the law-who has the law helped? The Clean Air Act, originally enacted in 1970, has been around long enough to allow for heavy-duty number crunching. Reilly, a senior adviser to the private equity firm TPG Capital.

How to cite this page

Environmentalism is not pain-free, nor are the politics around it simple. The facilities that would be affected emit some 386,000 tons of toxic air pollution a year. Exposure to these pollutants can cause birth defects, as well as lung and heart illnesses. Hill, president of the 725,000-member International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, appreciates the hazards, but said in a May 16 statement that unless utilities were given an extra five or six years to modernize or close their oldest coal plants, about 50,000 workers in power, mining, and railroads would lose their jobs.

Utilities, unsurprisingly, warn that the cost figure would be much higher. Aggressive EPA action—on either greenhouse gases or mercury and more terrestrial pollutants—would present owner Midwest Generation with a dilemma: Are the antiquated plants worth expensive upgrades, as opposed to just shutting them down? The facilities directly employ a total of 200 people.

The Clean Air Act can serve as a goad to generating better jobs in more innovative technologies—and as a mechanism to reduce health-care costs. The benefits seem worth the price. What might be likely to happen to amend the law or change it in some way? It is the best path to guarantee merit and dignity to the results we achieve.