Term papers writing service


Rich get richer poor get prison essay

The American criminal justice system wants to maintain the high percentage of the poor population who committed crime. To prove his claim, through his students, he came up with a correctional system that would make a group of criminal stable and visible instead of reducing or eradicating the cases of crimes. They came up with the following suggestions: Strictly execute certain national laws that would focus on combating social problems rich get richer poor get prison essay prostitution, gambling, and drug abuse that are more likely related to crimes; Deprive those who committed crimes of some of their rights for the rest of their lives; Do not provide trainings for the prisoners for their future jobs after being released; Make the experience of the criminals in prison even worse; Give powers to the police, judges, and prosecutors to choose who would be arrested, jailed, or charged.

He backed up his claim by saying that cases of drug abuses could not be merely reduced by putting in jail the arrested drug users. He added that the decline in the commitment of heinous crimes could not really be due to the strict implementation or reinforcement of the existing laws but rather due to the changing demographic characteristics in the society. Reiman furthered that cases of crimes could actually be reduced if we really want to.

He explained that we are just too full of excuses to do what we should be doing to reduce the cases of crimes. We are aware of the existing problems in the society like prison, drugs, and poverty yet we do not do something about it.

He suggested that we all have the power to ban guns and decriminalize drugs to prevent all of these to happen.

The existing criminal justice system, he argued, could be viewed as: He claimed that the existing criminal justice system seems to portray a particular image of crime neglecting or ignoring which hides the larger picture of the crimes in the society.

He viewed that the existing criminal justice system only considers the personal assaults as crimes not concerned over carelessness as a form of crime.

The Rich Get Richer and the Poor Get Prison Essay

Reiman furthered that in the workplace, like in the hospitals, there are actually high risks of committing crimes. He added that even the use of chemical by some giant companies could also be considered as a form of crime.

Reiman felt that the criminal justice system does not really know what is detrimental to the society. It could also be observed that those in prison usually come from the lowest economic strata of the society. Circumstances would expose that poor criminals are those who are usually immediately arrested and imprisoned while the rich or the wealthier who committed crimes would just be merely warned.

  1. In testing this idea, Reiman had his students construct a correctional system that would maintain a stable and visible group of criminals, rather than eliminating or reducing crime, and they suggested the following.
  2. He explained that we are just too full of excuses to do what we should be doing to reduce the cases of crimes. Reiman believes that the criminal justice system helps create this reality, projecting a particular image of crime and hiding the larger reality of social injustice and even white-collar crime.
  3. He has written numerous books on political philosophy, criminology, and sociology. He explained that we are just too full of excuses to do what we should be doing to reduce the cases of crimes.
  4. Expand your research by topic.

Reiman used several evidences to back up his claim that there is indeed different treatment for the Blacks who committed crimes. The evidences that he presented are as follows: Reiman said that the economic status of an individual may be an advantage for not committing a particular crime.

He observed that the police, judge, and prosecutors would most likely send a poor criminal to jail rather that the wealthy ones. Even when the wealthy criminals are arrested and jailed it is rare that they would do or endure particular sufferings that the convicted poor criminals undergo.

He found out that the failure of the criminal justice system to fulfill its role is not merely by accident but because of the intention of the wealthy to keep the system as it is.

The rich appear to prevent the criminal justice system to define what justice really is.

We can write ANY essay exclusively for you and make you proud of the result!

Despite the existing situation, Reiman did not claim that there is actually a conspiracy between the wealthy and the criminal justice system. He said that the poor are only victims of this social predicament.

Because the poor do not have the money to change the system, they are being left behind as the major perpetuator to crimes.

  • The existing criminal justice system has equated crime to the poor;
  • Reiman is less convincing in the way he describes the system as intentionally bias, for he makes it sound as if it were an organized conspiracy;
  • The poor are more likely to be victims, as well, and they lack the money or power to change the system in any way;
  • The evidences that he presented are as follows;
  • Taken as a whole, Reiman's book puts forth a solid argument that the system does not serve the public as presently constituted, and the proof is not merely in growing or diminishing crime rates, but in incorporating a broader concept of social justice into the system itself.

They do not have the means of initiating change in the rotten criminal justice system. He also stressed that the existing criminal justice system put a particular stereotype among the poor.

  • They should not only serve the interests and welfare of the wealthy;
  • The situation of the criminal justice system would prove his claim;
  • He has written numerous books on political philosophy, criminology, and sociology.

The society would usually view the poor as those who would engage their selves in crimes. The existing criminal justice system has equated crime to the poor. In ending the chapter of his book, he said that the society is just embracing the system of social equity especially in the area of criminal justice. He argued that the society is just pushing against the welfare of the poor. He added that the society or the government is not doing anything to break the stigma among the poor being related to crimes.

For Reiman, instead of protecting the rights and welfare of every member of the society, it rather promotes discrimination in the criminal justice system.

The situation of the criminal justice system would prove his claim.

How to cite this page

We cannot deny the fact that we usually perceive crimes as usually committed by the poor. Whenever we heard stories of crimes committed by the wealthy ones, we are usually concerned over them or give them the benefit of the doubt.

Although there are existing local laws that gives and promotes equality in the treatment of criminals, the reality, however, is not observing what is right. Since time immemorial, there have been certain judgments and stereotypes that we pass among the poor, especially the poor Blacks. We do not see them being swarmed inside a prison cell. I think his work is just a mirror of what could be seen in the society.

The government should do something about it. They should not only serve the interests and welfare of the wealthy. After all, the poor and the Blacks are also their constituents. The wealthy should not, in any way, manipulate the criminal justice system through their money and power. There should be justice for all—no matter what his or her economic and social strata is.

True enough, it is upon us if we really want to change this rotten system.

Example essay writing, topic: Rich Get Richer The Poor Get Prison

How to cite this page Choose cite format: