Term papers writing service


Death penalty or life in prison essay

True, on paper the plan looks very good, but it will not work. There is 28-step procedure necessary before any person can be given a death sentence. By having the process consist of numerous steps and involving many different people, human error is greatly reduced.

  • Again the death penalty prevents;
  • An example is poor people;
  • More room and extra counselors would be needed in order to address everyone;
  • There is still a room for change in a person.

The death penalty is not racially or gender bias, much to the contrary of what the affirmative team believes. The fact is that men commit more crimes, so they will be convicted at a greater rate then women. The ratio of men to women on death row and executed is 68: From 1976-1994, men committed 7 times as many murders as women or a 7: Therefore, it may be statically shown that men are, by a 70: Like gender bias, racial bias is nonexistent in the rulings involving the death penalty.

  1. Capital punishment shows what an uncivilized and immoral society we are.
  2. Life is an important gift given by God.
  3. Why fix something that is not broken.

The death penalty is not bias to any race, but by just looking at the numbers it may seem that it is. The total populations of each race will give the illusion of bias, but that is not true. The affirmative side also argues that the cost of life in prison without parole is much cheaper then the cost of the death penalty, but this, like their charge of bias, is also untrue. No one team can give impartial numbers since studies by both sides are bias.

  • More people are looking into ways to get rid of the death penalty or at least gain more support to have such rulings overturned;
  • They know how to feel and love;
  • If a convicted murderer is put into prison for life without parole, that person is given another chance to kill again;
  • That is the goal of the death penalty, not to get revenge on the criminal, but to prevent more crimes of the same nature form occurring;
  • Murder is unacceptable by society, yet people seem to approve killing criminals;
  • They are too scared of what the people might do to them when they learn that they are already out of prison.

There is no need for change because the current system is working just fine. Why fix something that is not broken. The death penalty deters crime.

Is life in prison without parole better than the death penalty? Essay

Houston had the highest murder rate in 1981, with 701 murders. In 1982, Texas resumed executions. Since then Houston has executed more murderers than any other city or state, except Texas, and has seen the greatest reduction in murder. The city went from 701 murders to 216 murders in a 15-year span.

The innocents, the-would-be victims were saved from a harsh death by the death penalty that supposedly did not work. An econometric study from 1994 indicated that each execution deters 8 or more murders.

Life Imprisonment without Parole vs. the Death Penalty

That is the goal of the death penalty, not to get revenge on the criminal, but to prevent more crimes of the same nature form occurring. Execution equals deterrent, which ultimately leads to prevention.

If a convicted murderer is put into prison for life without parole, that person is given another chance to kill again. What will happen if that person kills again in prison or even if they escape and kill again? According to the affirmative side, that person will be put back into prison and given another chance to kill. If the death penalty would have been imposed that person would have never had the second chance.

Again the death penalty prevents. The death penalty is not cruel and unusual because most states favor the lethal injection, which is not cruel in anyway.

IELTS essay about life imprisonment and death penalty

It is true that botched executions do occur, but like innocents that are executed, it is rare. What about the victim, who was killed, was it fair for them to die and suffer?

The victim was murdered for no reason, while the murderer would be executed for no reason. If one is going to break the law, they must be prepared to face that same law down the road. Why should any citizen be allowed to wrong the laws of this great country and not have to face the same fate as their victim?

By not imposing the death penalty it is an insult to society and the victim.

Blog Archive

Lowering appeals will result in a lower cost and shortening the time that the entire process takes. With these two repairs and a few other minor repairs, but still relying mostly on the present system, the death penalty will be able to be used to its fullest extent. With overpopulation comes a greater need for rehab.

  • It should be taken seriously and should not be abused;
  • It requires a long process for capital cases, which is needed in order to make sure that innocent individuals are not executed for crimes they did not commit;
  • The innocents, the-would-be victims were saved from a harsh death by the death penalty that supposedly did not work;
  • It should be taken seriously and should not be abused.

More room and extra counselors would be needed in order to address everyone. This cost even more money.

Essay: Death Penalty

The real prisoners, who could be rehabilitated, will not have the chance because with more prisoners in rehab, they will not get the right amount of attention. We, the negative team, offer a plan that already has been proven, has limited negative aspects and innumerable benefits, and as a whole captures the ability to get the job done.