Term papers writing service


Argumentative essay on against the smoking ban

Why Smoking Should Not Be Banned Smoking is a source of great controversy, and most individuals either support it or oppose it. Almost no middle ground exists on the topic of tobacco smoking, and individuals against smoking have taken great strides to promote the cessation of smoking in public places.

Blog Archive

Unfortunately, this has led to the formation of numerous laws that forbid smoking in specific public places like restaurants, bars, parks, and in some cities, even street corners. Smoking bans target a very wide demographic, alienating regular customers of some establishment and killing business in others. If only for this reason, most smoking bans should not be in place. Even in specific states, different jurisdictions often come with different laws.

Arguments Against Smoking Bans

That same foundation has worked tirelessly to successfully ban smoking in all public places including bars, restaurants, workplaces, and even public streets. Their logic is that banning smoking will cleanse the air of impurities that smokers choose to ingest, but should not inflict onto others. The unfortunate truth is that not every business wants to place a ban on smoking. In the early 2000s when smoking bans in bars grew more rigid, the owners and managers of nightlife establishments complained that business took a sharp downward spiral as a result.

People could no longer smoke in establishments that served food and customers did not want to come in for drinks, only to step outside whenever they wanted to smoke.

  • However, despite the seeming rationality standing behind these measures, smoking bans are in fact much less fair than it is usually considered;
  • One of the main impacts of smoking on athletic performance is a decrease in lung function;
  • One of the main impacts of smoking on athletic performance is a decrease in lung function;
  • Moreover, smokers today have no right to smoke in a number of other public places, such as beaches, public transport stops, or parks;
  • As we know, smoking also act as the pivotal cause of chronic bronchitis;
  • Due to the fact, more smoke you breathe, the more it damages your lungs but it can be more hazardous to a passive smoker who inhales the smoke being in close vicinity of the active smoker.

Bar owners lost money because of smoking bans; some were even forced out of business. This is especially unfair to business owners who did not receive options before the bans became law. The biggest argument from individuals who support smoking bans is that they should not have to breathe polluted air just because people near them want to smoke.

  1. Smokers inhale tobacco smoke into their lungs, which irritates the air passages. Exhaust fumes from cars, smoke from the cookers of nearby restaurants, and the dust on city streets do more harm than the occasional whiff of cigarette smoke, yet no bans exist to prevent people from driving, cooking, or kicking up dust.
  2. And it is often hard to get the smell of smoke out. Smoking in the kitchen is forbidden, so no food is contaminated, and if some individuals are offended by smoke, they have the option of taking their business elsewhere.
  3. Their logic is that banning smoking will cleanse the air of impurities that smokers choose to ingest, but should not inflict onto others.
  4. Smoking remains a legal activity, and tobacco is a legal substance. It is strange democratic societies do not compromise in these circumstances UnhealthyNationFS.
  5. In general, I think the world would be a better place without cigarettes and that is why smoking should be banned. Unfortunately, nonsmokers continue to wage war against smokers despite the alternatives, claiming that their health is at stake and that a little inconvenience for one group of people can go a long way for everybody else.

They fear exposure to secondhand smoke and react accordingly. Exhaust fumes from cars, smoke from the cookers of nearby restaurants, and the dust on city streets do more harm than the occasional whiff of cigarette smoke, yet no bans exist to prevent people from driving, cooking, or kicking up dust.

Smoking is a personal choice, and most smokers are considerate of nonsmokers. Businesses also took strides to create friendly environments for smokers and nonsmokers alike.

Argumentative Essay about Why Smoking Should be Banned

Before smoking bans became law in the United States, patrons of restaurants were given options regarding whether they wanted to sit in the smoking section or the nonsmoking section. Nonsmoking sections usually came equipped with proper ventilation, limiting where the smoke and odor traveled within the restaurant.

This also means that the smoke did not pollute any food. However, this does not justify banning smoking in areas where only adults are allowed like bars and nightclubs. Smoking in the kitchen is forbidden, so no food is contaminated, and if some individuals are offended by smoke, they have the option of taking their business elsewhere.

Essay: Why Smoking Should Not Be Banned

Unfortunately, nonsmokers continue to wage war against smokers despite the alternatives, claiming that their health is at stake and that a little inconvenience for one group of people can go a long way for everybody else.

This is an unfair practice, but one backed by the government in the form of smoking bans.

  • The only thing that really helps a person avoid the problems associated with smoking is staying smoke free;
  • Due to the fact, more smoke you breathe, the more it damages your lungs but it can be more hazardous to a passive smoker who inhales the smoke being in close vicinity of the active smoker;
  • Even in specific states, different jurisdictions often come with different laws;
  • Unfortunately, this has led to the formation of numerous laws that forbid smoking in specific public places like restaurants, bars, parks, and in some cities, even street corners.

Businesses should have the right to determine whether or not to allow smoking. Business owners, employees, and patrons can make decisions for themselves and decide whether or not they want to expose themselves to smoky environments.