Term papers writing service

Aiding students comprehension of english subject education essay

They can recognize human sounds; can distinguish animate from inanimate objects; and have an inherent sense of space, motion, number, and causality. These raw capacities of the human infant are actualized by the environment surrounding a newborn. The brain of a developing child is a product, at the molecular level, of interactions between biological and ecological factors. Mind is created in this process. Cognitive changes do not result from mere accretion of information, but are due to processes involved in conceptual reorganization.

Research from many fields has supplied the key findings about how early cognitive abilities relate to learning. These include the following: In some domains, most obviously language, but also for biological and physical causality and number, they seem predisposed to learn.

Children are ignorant but not stupid: Young children lack knowledge, but they do have abilities to reason with the knowledge they understand. Children are problem solvers and, through curiosity, generate questions and problems: Children attempt to solve problems presented to them, and they also seek novel challenges. They persist because success and understanding are motivating in their own right. Children develop knowledge of their own learning capacities— metacognition—very early.

This metacognitive capacity gives them the ability to plan and monitor their success and to correct errors when necessary. Brain, Mind, Experience, and School: The National Academies Press. Neurocognitive research has contributed evidence that both the developing and the mature brain are structurally altered during learning. For example, the weight and thickness of the cerebral cortex of rats is altered when they have direct contact with a stimulating physical environment and an interactive social group.

The structure of the nerve cells themselves is correspondingly altered: Learning specific tasks appears to alter the specific regions of the brain appropriate to the task. In humans, for example, brain reorganization has been demonstrated in the language functions of deaf individuals, in rehabilitated stroke patients, and in the visual cortex of people who are blind from birth.

These findings suggest that the brain is a dynamic organ, shaped to a great extent by experience and by what a living being does. Transfer of Learning A major goal of schooling is to prepare students for flexible adaptation to new problems and settings.

Many approaches to instruction look equivalent when the only measure of learning is memory for facts that were specifically presented. Instructional differences become more apparent when evaluated from the perspective of how well the learning transfers to new problems and settings.

Transfer can be explored at a variety of levels, including transfer from one set of concepts to another, one school subject to another, one year of school to another, and across school and everyday, nonschool activities.

People must achieve a threshold of initial learning that is sufficient to support transfer. This obvious point is often overlooked and can lead to erroneous conclusions about the effectiveness of various instructional approaches. It takes time to learn complex subject matter, and assessments of transfer must take into account the degree to which original learning with understanding was accomplished. Practice aiding students comprehension of english subject education essay getting familiar with subject matter take time, but most important is how people use their time while Page 236 Share Cite Suggested Citation: Such activities are very different from simply reading and rereading a text.

Learning with understanding is more likely to promote transfer than simply memorizing information from a text or a lecture. Many classroom activities stress the importance of memorization over learning with understanding. Many, as well, focus on facts and details rather than larger themes of causes and consequences of events. The shortfalls of these approaches are not apparent if the only test of learning involves tests of memory, but when the transfer of learning is measured, the advantages of learning with understanding are likely to be revealed.

Knowledge that is taught in a variety of contexts is more likely to support flexible transfer than knowledge that is taught in a single context. When material is taught in multiple contexts, aiding students comprehension of english subject education essay are more likely to extract the relevant features of the concepts and develop a more flexible representation of knowledge that can be used more generally. Students develop flexible understanding of when, where, why, and how to use their knowledge to solve new problems if they learn how to extract underlying themes and principles from their learning exercises.

Understanding how and when to put knowledge to use—known as conditions of applicability—is an important characteristic of expertise. Learning in multiple contexts most likely affects this aspect of transfer. Transfer of learning is an active process. An alternative assessment approach is to consider how learning affects subsequent learning, such as increased speed of learning in a new domain. All learning involves transfer from previous experiences. Even initial learning involves transfer that is based on previous experiences and prior knowledge.

Transfer is not simply something that may or may not appear after initial learning has occurred. For example, knowledge relevant to a particular task may not automatically be activated by learners and may not serve as a source of positive transfer for learning new information. Sometimes the knowledge that people bring to a new situation impedes subsequent learning because it guides thinking in wrong directions.

Looking for other ways to read this?

Page 237 Share Cite Suggested Citation: In these kinds of situations, teachers must help students change their original conceptions rather than simply use the misconceptions as a basis for further understanding or leaving new material unconnected to current understanding. Competent and Expert Performance Cognitive science research has helped us understand how learners develop a knowledge base as they learn. An individual moves from being a novice in a subject area toward developing competency in that area through a series of learning processes.

An understanding of the structure of knowledge provides guidelines for ways to assist learners acquire a knowledge base effectively and efficiently. Eight factors affect the development of expertise and competent performance: Relevant knowledge helps people organize information in ways that support their abilities to remember. Learners do not always relate the knowledge they possess to new tasks, despite its potential relevance. Different representations of the same problem can make it easy, difficult, or impossible to solve.

The sophisticated problem representations of experts are the result of well-organized knowledge structures. Experts know the conditions of applicability of their knowledge, and they are able to access the relevant knowledge with considerable ease. Different domains of knowledge, such as science, mathematics, and history, have different organizing properties.

Competent learners and problem solvers monitor and regulate their own processing and change their strategies as necessary. Like the work of experts, everyday competencies are supported by sets of tools and social norms that allow people to perform tasks in specific contexts that they often cannot perform elsewhere.

Conclusions Everyone has understanding, resources, and interests on which to build. Learning a topic does not begin from knowing nothing to learning that is based on entirely new information. This view of the interactions of learners with one another and with teachers derives from generalizations about learning mechanisms and the conditions that promote understanding.

It begins with the obvious: The most effective learning occurs when learners transport what they have learned to various and diverse new situations. This view of learning also includes the not so obvious: Effective comprehension and thinking require a coherent understanding of the organizing principles in any subject matter; understanding the essential features of the problems of various school subjects will lead to better reasoning and problem solving; early competencies are foundational to later complex learning; self-regulatory processes enable self-monitoring and control of learning processes by learners themselves.

Transfer and wide application of learning are most likely to occur when learners achieve an aiding students comprehension of english subject education essay and coherent understanding of the material; when the situations for transfer share the structure of the original Page 239 Share Cite Suggested Citation: Learning and understanding can be facilitated in learners by emphasizing organized, coherent bodies of knowledge in which specific facts and details are embeddedby helping learners learn how to transfer their learning, and by helping them use what they learn.

In-depth understanding requires detailed knowledge of the facts within a domain. The key attribute of expertise is a detailed and organized understanding of the important facts within a specific domain.

Education needs to provide children with sufficient mastery of the details of particular subject matters so that they have a foundation for further exploration within those domains. Expertise can be promoted in learners.

The predominant indicator of expert status is the amount of time spent learning and working in a subject area to gain mastery of the content. Secondarily, the more one knows about a subject, the easier it is to learn additional knowledge. The major ideas that have transformed understanding of learning also have implications for teaching. Teaching for In-Depth Learning Traditional education has tended to emphasize memorization and mastery of text.

Research on the development of expertise, however, indicates that more than a set of general problem-solving skills or memory for an array of facts is necessary to achieve deep understanding. Expertise requires well-organized knowledge of concepts, principles, and procedures of inquiry.


Various subject disciplines are organized differently and require an array of approaches to inquiry. We presented a discussion of the three subject areas of history, mathematics, and science learning to illustrate how the structure of the knowledge domain guides both learning and teaching. Proponents of the new approaches to teaching engage students in a variety of different activities for constructing a knowledge base in the subject domain.

Such approaches involve both a set of facts and clearly defined principles. One way to do this is by showing students that they already have relevant knowledge. For older students, model-based reasoning in mathematics is an effective approach.

  1. Cognitive changes do not result from mere accretion of information, but are due to processes involved in conceptual reorganization. The major ideas that have transformed understanding of learning also have implications for teaching.
  2. Different representations of the same problem can make it easy, difficult, or impossible to solve. Teachers need to develop understanding of the theories of knowledge epistemologies that guide the subject-matter disciplines in which they work.
  3. Children attempt to solve problems presented to them, and they also seek novel challenges.
  4. Research suggests that the most effective way to improve students' writing is a process called inquiry.
  5. These raw capacities of the human infant are actualized by the environment surrounding a newborn. They need to comprehend what they read through a three-stage meaning-making process.

Beginning with the building of physical models, this approach develops abstract symbol system-based models, such as algebraic equations or geometry-based solutions. Model-based approaches entail selecting and exploring the properties of a model and then applying the model to answer a question that interests the student. This important approach emphasizes understanding over routine memorization and provides students with a learning tool that enables them to figure out new solutions as old ones become obsolete.

These new approaches to mathematics operate from knowledge that learning involves extending understanding to new situations, a guiding principle of transfer Chapter 3 ; that young children come to school with early mathematics concepts Chapter 4 ; that learners cannot always identify and call up relevant knowledge Chapters 23and 4 ; and that learning is promoted by encouraging children to try out the ideas and strategies they bring with them to school-based learning Chapter 6.

Students in classes that use the new approaches do not begin learning mathematics by sitting at desks and only doing computational problems. Rather, they are encouraged to explore their own knowledge and to invent strategies for solving problems and to discuss with others why their strategies work or do not work. A key aspect of the new ways of teaching science is to focus on helping students overcome deeply rooted misconceptions that interfere with learning.

Casual observations are useful for explaining why a rock falls faster than a leaf, but they can lead to misconceptions that are difficult to overcome.

Reading and Writing for Understanding

Misconceptions, however, are also the starting point for new approaches to teaching scientific thinking. Students can often answer fact-based questions on tests that imply understanding, but misconceptions will surface as the students are questioned about scientific concepts. Teaching history for depth of understanding has generated new approaches that recognize that students need to learn about the assumptions any historian makes for connecting events and schemes into a narrative.

The process involves learning that any historical account is a history and not the history.