Term papers writing service


Ways to determine a persons true character

The True Definition of a Protagonist Main Character, Protagonist, Story Limit, and Story Outcome Many think they know, but the comfort of their preconceptions blinds them to the complexity of sophisticated storytelling.

  1. Some stories are limited by time, some by the number of options left open to the Protagonist. The best communicators talk and talk—and then listen for a response.
  2. Learn more Build Meaningful Connections You are not alone.
  3. The True Definition of a Protagonist Main Character, Protagonist, Story Limit, and Story Outcome Many think they know, but the comfort of their preconceptions blinds them to the complexity of sophisticated storytelling. Highly likable people at work are those who can set aside their concerns and go with the flow.
  4. Amadeus is about Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, yet we see his wild antics through poor mediocre Salieri.
  5. In contrast to Clarice or Jake, Michael is in a much better place at the end of his story.

Earlier this year the distinction was made between the Main Character and the Protagonist. Once a writer understands the difference between Main Character and Protagonist, whole worlds of possible storylines open up to them. Why should a writer be confined to stories where the character the audience identifies most with is also one the leading the charge?

It would be great to tell a story about an innocent man trying to escape jail…from the perspective of another inmate who lost hope a long time ago.

Or what about a story where a writer in East Germany tries to broadcast the plight of his people…from the perspective of the man forced to spy on him.

10 Simple Ways to Make People Like You More

Thus, the Main Character is not always the key focus of a story. Amadeus is about Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, yet we see his wild antics through poor mediocre Salieri. A character may be the subject matter of a piece without also being the one we receive intimate personal insight into. The Protagonist is not always the one who changes in the story. Clarice endeavors to stop Buffalo Bill. Salieri wants to be remembered.

Character Quotes

It is apparent that there too are big problems happening in Michael Clayton and that there are efforts being made to resolve them. In contrast to Clarice or Jake, Michael is in a much better place at the end of his story. He has resolved his issues with his family, grown closer to his estranged brothers, and, going on, one can imagine Michael will improve his superficial relationship with his son. In the case of Silence or Chinatown, both Main Characters are left with unresolved feelings, yet their respective cases have been solved.

The True Definition of a Protagonist

But the good guys won? This motivation to pursue must be present within every act otherwise the story will breakdown as was the case in Zombieland. Sure Arthur would like to take them down, but he is more like the fly in the ointment rather than the one actively pursuing a clear goal from the very beginning. It is Karen who is driving the story towards the goal of having uNorth escape this lawsuit unscathed.

As an audience we may find this act reprehensible, but objectively—without preconceptions of right or wrong—it becomes clear that this is what is truly going on.

A Negative Goal is one many in the audience might find detestable or immoral. In Reservoir Dogs, the bad guys— Mr. White Harvey Keitel et.

Your Emotional Type Quiz

While outside of the world of the story it may be difficult to side with vicious jewelry thieves with an affinity for ear removal, the problems that Quentin Tarantino constructed for these characters placed these crooks at the head of the charge to resolve them. This character is for something, this character is working towards solving the problem at hand.

From the very beginning, Karen represents the drive to pursue in the larger context of the story. In fact, another quality of an Archetypal Protagonist, that of being driven to weigh the pros and cons of a situation, can also be applied to her.

“It’s so incredible to finally be understood.”

It is the same with stories. Some stories are limited by time, some by the number of options left open to the Protagonist. High Noon is an example of the first. Michael Clayton is an example of the second. With Karen in place as the Protagonist, it becomes very clear what the options in the story are: There are only so many ways she can deal with a mad rogue attorney running around with damning evidence.

She has to get rid of everyone who had contact with it including the attorney himself and destroy any proof of it before the story can come to its rightful conclusion. This final scene would be the climax of the story—that moment in a story when the limit has been reached and the Main Character must come to a decision regarding their resolve. If it were Michael or Arthur as the Protagonist it becomes less clear as to what the options would have been.

But these seem weak and murky, and are interpretations of what could be there rather than what is there.

  • This final scene would be the climax of the story—that moment in a story when the limit has been reached and the Main Character must come to a decision regarding their resolve;
  • He has resolved his issues with his family, grown closer to his estranged brothers, and, going on, one can imagine Michael will improve his superficial relationship with his son;
  • More importantly, those who have all of the answers are usually pushing their own agenda;
  • If it were Michael or Arthur as the Protagonist it becomes less clear as to what the options would have been;
  • Wish I had known about my personality type 20 years ago, that would have saved me much grief;
  • Why should a writer be confined to stories where the character the audience identifies most with is also one the leading the charge?

And the reason it works so well and seems so unique in its complexity is because, structurally, it differs from everything else out there. This appreciation of what is really going on in a story is one of those things that makes the theory so special.