Term papers writing service


The two main types of an ecosystems succession

History[ edit ] Precursors of the idea of ecological succession go back to the beginning of the 19th century. The French naturalist Adolphe Dureau de la Malle was the first to make use of the word succession concerning the vegetation development after forest clear-cutting. In 1859 Henry David Thoreau wrote an address called "The Succession of Forest Trees" [6] in which he described succession in an oak-pine forest.

Cowles[ edit ] The Indiana Dunes on Lake Michigan, which stimulated Cowles' development of his theories of ecological succession Henry Chandler Cowlesat the University of Chicagodeveloped a more formal concept of succession. Inspired by studies of Danish dunes by Eugen WarmingCowles studied vegetation development on sand dunes on the shores of Lake Michigan the Indiana Dunes.

He recognized that vegetation on dunes of different ages might be interpreted as different stages of a general trend of vegetation development on dunes an approach to the study of vegetation change later termed space-for-time substitution, or chronosequence studies. He first published this work as a paper in the Botanical Gazette in 1899 "The ecological relations of the vegetation of the sand dunes of Lake Michigan".

In this classic publication and subsequent papers, he formulated the idea of primary succession and the notion of a sere —a repeatable sequence of community changes specific to particular environmental circumstances. Clements explicitly analogized the successional development of ecological communities with ontogenetic development of individual organisms, and his model is often referred to as the pseudo-organismic theory of community ecology.

Ecological Succession Definition

Clements and his followers developed a complex taxonomy of communities and successional pathways. Henry Gleason offered a contrasting framework as early as the 1920s. The Gleasonian model was more complex and much less deterministic than the Clementsian.

It differs most fundamentally from the Clementsian view in suggesting a much greater role of chance factors and in denying the existence of coherent, sharply bounded community types. Gleason argued that species distributions responded individualistically to environmental factors, and communities were best regarded as artifacts of the juxtaposition of species distributions. Gleason's ideas, first published in 1926, were largely ignored until the late 1950s. Two quotes illustrate the contrasting views of Clements and Gleason.

Clements wrote in 1916: The developmental study of vegetation necessarily rests upon the assumption that the unit or climax formation is an organic entity. As an organism the formation arises, grows, matures, and dies. Furthermore, each climax formation is able to reproduce itself, repeating with essential fidelity the stages of its development. An association is not an organism, the two main types of an ecosystems succession even a vegetational unit, but merely a coincidence.

About Clements' distinction between primary succession and secondary successionCowles wrote 1911: This classification seems not to be of fundamental value, since it separates such closely related phenomena as those of erosion and deposition, and it places together such unlike things as human agencies and the subsidence of land.

Succession theory has since become less monolithic and more complex. Slatyer attempted a codification of successional processes by mechanism. Among British and North American ecologists, the notion of a stable climax vegetation has been largely abandoned, and successional processes have come to be seen as much less deterministic, with important roles for historical contingency and for alternate pathways in the actual development of communities.

Debates continue as to the general predictability of successional dynamics and the relative importance of equilibrial vs. Former Harvard professor F. Bazzaz introduced the notion of scale into the discussion, as he considered that at local or small area scale the processes are stochastic and patchy, but taking bigger regional areas into consideration, certain tendencies can not be denied. Some of these factors contribute to predictability of succession dynamics; others add more probabilistic elements.

Two important perturbation factors today are human actions and climatic change. As succession proceeds, these species will tend to be replaced by more competitive k-selected species. Trends in ecosystem and community properties in succession have been suggested, but few appear to be general. For example, species diversity almost necessarily increases during the two main types of an ecosystems succession succession as new species arrive, but may decline in later succession as competition eliminates opportunistic species and leads to dominance by locally superior competitors.

What is ecological succession and its types?

Net Primary Productivitybiomassand trophic properties all show variable patterns over succession, depending on the particular system and site. Ecological succession was formerly seen as having a stable end-stage called the climaxsometimes referred to as the 'potential vegetation' of a site, and shaped primarily by the local climate. This idea has been largely abandoned by modern ecologists in favor of nonequilibrium ideas of ecosystems dynamics.

Most natural ecosystems experience disturbance at a rate that makes a "climax" community unattainable. Climate change often occurs at a rate and frequency sufficient to prevent arrival at a climax state. Additions to available species pools through range expansions and introductions can also continually reshape communities.

The development of some ecosystem attributes, such as soil properties and nutrient cyclesare both influenced by community properties, and, in turn, influence further successional development.

This feed-back process may occur only over centuries or millennia.

  • Succession takes place because through the processes of living, growing and reproducing, organisms interact with and affect the environment within an area, gradually changing it;
  • The climax stage is stable, but not static;
  • Coupled with the stochastic nature of disturbance events and other long-term e;
  • Ecological succession is the process that describes how the structure of a biological community that is, an interacting group of various species in a desert , forest , grassland , marine environment , and so on changes over time;
  • Edaphic Climax When there are more than one climax communities in the region, modified by local conditions of the substrate such as soil moisture, soil nutrients, topography, slope exposure, fire, and animal activity, it is called edaphic climax;
  • Ecological Succession - Summary An example of succession.

Coupled with the stochastic nature of disturbance events and other long-term e. Primary, secondary and cyclic succession[ edit ] An example of Secondary Succession by stages: A stable deciduous forest community 2.

A disturbance, such as a wild fire, destroys the forest 3. The fire burns the forest to the ground 4. The fire leaves behind empty, but not destroyed, soil 5. Grasses and other herbaceous plants grow back first 6. Small bushes and trees begin to colonize the area 7. Fast growing evergreen trees develop to their fullest, while shade-tolerant trees develop in the understory 8. The short-lived and shade intolerant evergreen trees die as the larger deciduous trees overtop them. The ecosystem is now back to a similar state to where it began.

  1. There are four main types of ecological succession. Let us suppose that the granite wall was quarried by man, and then abandoned once they had what they needed.
  2. Shade-tolerant species will invade the area.
  3. Population — A group of organisms of the same species that interbreed.
  4. Secondary Succession The above graphic is an example of secondary ecological succession.
  5. Fast growing evergreen trees develop to their fullest, while shade-tolerant trees develop in the understory 8. It is of paramount importance to know the tolerance of species in order to practice an effective silviculture.

Primary successionSecondary successionand Cyclic succession Successional dynamics beginning with colonization of an area that has not been previously occupied by an ecological community, such as newly exposed rock or sand surfaces, lava flows, newly exposed glacial tills, etc. The stages of primary succession include pioneer plants lichens and mossesgrassy stage, smaller shrubs, and trees.

Animals begin to return when there is food there for them to eat. When it is a fully functioning ecosystem, it has reached the climax community stage. For example, parts of Acadia National Park in Maine went through primary succession.

Successional dynamics following severe disturbance or removal of a pre-existing community are called secondary succession.

Dynamics in secondary succession are strongly influenced by pre-disturbance conditions, including soil development, seed banks, remaining organic matter, and residual living organisms. Because of residual fertility and pre-existing organisms, community change in early stages of secondary succession can be relatively rapid.

In a fragmented old field habitat created in eastern Kansas, woody plants "colonized more rapidly per unit area on large and nearby patches ". Particularly common types of secondary succession include responses to natural disturbances such as fire, flood, and severe winds, and to human-caused disturbances such as logging and agriculture. As an example, secondary succession has been occurring in Shenandoah National Park following the 1995 flood of the Mormon River, which destroyed plant and animal life.

Today, plant and animal species are beginning to return. Seasonal and cyclic the two main types of an ecosystems succession edit ] Unlike secondary succession, these types of vegetation change are not dependent on disturbance but are periodic changes arising from fluctuating species interactions or recurring events.

These models modify the climax concept towards one of dynamic states. Causes of plant succession[ edit ] Autogenic succession can be brought by changes in the soil caused by the organisms there.

These changes include accumulation of organic matter in litter or humic layer, alteration of soil nutrients, or change in the pH of soil due to the plants growing there.

Navigation menu

The structure of the plants themselves can also alter the community. For example, when larger species like trees mature, they produce shade on to the developing forest floor that tends to exclude light-requiring species. Shade-tolerant species will invade the area.

Allogenic succession is caused by external environmental influences and not by the vegetation. For example, soil changes due to erosion, leaching or the deposition of silt and clays can alter the nutrient content and water relationships in the ecosystems.

Animals also play an important role in allogenic changes as they are pollinators, seed dispersers and herbivores.

They can also increase nutrient content of the soil in certain areas, or shift soil about as termites, ants, and moles do creating patches in the habitat. This may create regeneration sites that favor certain species.

Ecological Succession

Climatic factors may be very important, but on a much longer time-scale than any other. Changes in temperature and rainfall patterns will promote changes in communities.

As the climate warmed at the end of each ice age, great successional changes took place. The tundra vegetation and bare glacial till deposits underwent succession to mixed deciduous forest. The greenhouse effect resulting in increase in temperature is likely to bring profound Allogenic changes in the next century.

Geological and climatic catastrophes such as volcanic eruptions, earthquakes, avalanches, meteors, floods, fires, and high wind also bring allogenic changes.

Mechanisms[ edit ] In 1916, Frederic Clements published a descriptive theory of succession and advanced it as a general ecological concept.

Ecological succession

Clements' concept is usually termed classical ecological theory. According to Clements, succession is a process involving several phases: Succession begins with the development of a bare site, called Nudation disturbance. It refers to arrival of propagules.

It involves establishment and initial growth of vegetation. As vegetation becomes well established, grow, and spread, various species begin to compete for space, light and nutrients.

During this phase autogenic changes such as the buildup of humus affect the habitat, and one plant community replaces another. A supposedly stable climax community forms. Seral community Pond succession or sere A: Emergent plants grow inwards, sediment accretes D: In many cases more than one seral stage evolves until climax conditions are attained. Depending on the substratum and climate, different seres are found. Changes in animal life[ edit ] Succession theory was developed primarily by botanists.

In lichen stage the fauna is sparse. It comprises few mites, ants and spiders living in the cracks and crevices.