Term papers writing service

The negative effects of the concept of pay to play to college athletes

  1. But what is the NCAA?
  2. My colleague makes one point that is totally accurate — a college graduate can in fact make a great deal more money over a lifetime when compared to non-graduates.
  3. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21, 209-226.
  4. And he still could not read! Pay Proposals It would appear that NCAA should get out of the commercial business of football and basketball and follow the Ivy League example of providing an environment that is truly amateur where student athletes actually are students first.
  5. It is vital to this process to view each NCAA issue independently and avoid making judgments on them as a whole.

Those who say college student-athletes should not be paid argue that they receive scholarships as a form of payment for their talents. Would athletes be paid differently depending on the sport they play? Where would the money even come from?

  • Still, colleges and universities use their athletic success to promote their school and entice potential applicants;
  • Eitzen notes that athletes are sometimes mistreated physically and mentally and are often denied the rights and freedoms of other citizens;
  • Now more than ever, we live in an era of entitlement.

The debate over whether student-athletes should be paid could go on and on. Yes, pay would vary, just as the universities with the more successful teams receive more television time or money than those with less successful teams. Student-athletes are the ones working hard out on the court and field.

Coaches might have a big effect on a team, but it is up to the athletes to get it done. Coaches receive bonuses for breaking records, reaching the offseason, and winning the big games; the athletes receive none of it, writes Tyson Hartnett for The Huffington Post. Most profits from college athletics do not go towards academics. Instead, they go to the coaches, athletic directors, and some administrators, reports Edelman.

Student-athletes do not need to receive huge salaries like their coaches; rather, they could still be paid a reasonable amount relative to how much the program makes. Still, colleges and universities use their athletic success to promote their school and entice potential applicants.

Point/Counterpoint: Paying College Athletes

Student-athletes would be paid for this and all the additional benefits they provide for their schools. A timeout of the regular-season college football game between the University of Michigan at the University of Iowa Photo: If scholarships were taken out of the deal, and only salaries were given, then it would be more fair and affordable for the university, right?

If salaries were given, then these college student-athletes would have to pay taxes. Cash or a salary could be spent on wants rather than necessities, potentially leading the athletes into a debt they would not have with the benefit of a scholarship. Furthermore, those who debate against paying student-athletes say it would change the very nature of college athletics.

College student-athletes are given a rare opportunity. The next year, they may transfer to another school with an even higher offer. The money to pay athletes must come from somewhere, which might put the least-popular college programs at risk of being cut. That, in turn, can deprive other students of their chance to gain the education and experience at the college of their dreams, since their desired program will no longer be offered, says Anderson.

  1. Big Ten considers pay research proposal.
  2. For example, there is one report of a Midwestern university using seven members of its team that included the town blacksmith, a lawyer, a livery man, and four railroad employees 5.
  3. Therefore, it is time to consider some pay-for-pay proposals.
  4. The black dumb jock. Why student-athletes are not paid to play.

It is not their job to play sports; it is an extracurricular activity that is pursued while pursuing a higher education. Student-athletes are going to school to learn, and many are lucky enough to do so for reduced cost, given the often generous athletic scholarships.

Why the NCAA won’t be paying college athletes anytime soon

If these athletes were paid, it would change their motives as students. They are still in college—which is a privilege in itself—while pursuing their dreams of playing a sport. What do you think? Whether student-athletes should be paid is an ongoing debate often brought up during championship seasons, especially the college football playoffs and the basketball post-season. Will a salary for college-athletes ever come to be? Why or why not? Leave a comment and debate your position!