Term papers writing service


Contribution of marshall plan in the foreign policy of united states

  1. At the same time, there are some things that United States just has to do because no foundation, no investor, and no government can or will.
  2. The Marshall Plan was very controversial at the time it was proposed. There are currently 30 or so countries that are fragile and weak.
  3. The Marshall Plan was very controversial at the time it was proposed. The notable exception was West Germany.

Search Toggle display of website navigation Elephants in the Room: Foreign Aid Is About U. Interests The Marshall Plan was always in America's national security interest.

Marshall Plan

June 26, 2017, 5: We had learned it was important to be magnanimous in victory — and learned it the hard way after World War I.

Far more important, we saw this foreign aid package as in our national security interest. Communism was increasingly appealing across Western Europe and it seemed very possible that we could lose a number of countries there through Soviet treachery. Something had to be done. So our foreign aid has never just been about merely doing good.

  • Also, governmental foreign aid has not been the largest wallet in the room for decades;
  • Foreign assistance was going to be a part of the arsenal of democracy.

Ever since the end of World War II, it has always also been recognized to be in our own interest. Rebuilding Europe was a project deeply linked to U. Communism was a clear and present danger to our way of life then — just as terrorism, drug-financed criminal gangs, and pandemics like Ebola are threats now. The plan hoped to stabilize European economies, improve their quality of life, and facilitate European cooperation. This cooperation sowed the seeds for what became the European Union.

All these areas also happened to be the battlefields of the new Cold War, where we were going to have to support our allies and undercut our adversaries.

  1. Newsreel report on U. Foreign assistance was going to be a part of the arsenal of democracy.
  2. To coordinate the European participation, 16 countries, led by the United Kingdom and France, established the Committee of European Economic Cooperation to suggest a four-year recovery program.
  3. Impact of the Marshall Plan Interestingly, in the decades since its implementation, the true economic benefit of the Marshall Plan has been the subject of much debate. Newsreel report on U.
  4. This led to relatively modest growth of GDP in these countries during the four-year period the plan was in effect. The plan hoped to stabilize European economies, improve their quality of life, and facilitate European cooperation.

Foreign assistance was going to be a part of the arsenal of democracy. The Marshall Plan was very controversial at the time it was proposed. Although the Marshall Plan ended in 1953, the impact of the program is ongoing: And all the nations we have aided, whether through the Marshall Plan or later programs, remember that the United States was there for them in their time of need.

These helped the United States consolidate its gains and win peace in former Warsaw Pact nations. In this improved development atmosphere, things are looking up.

Foreign Aid Is About U.S. Interests

Many nations are moving in the direction of South Korea or Chile — toward prosperity. Also, governmental foreign aid has not been the largest wallet in the room for decades: Nor is the United States or even the West the only game in town; if we do not meet the hopes and aspirations of these countries they can take their business to China. At the same time, there are some things that United States just has to do because no foundation, no investor, and no government can or will. Sometimes it is supporting a democratic election; sometimes it is leading from the front on Ebola; sometimes it is doing mind-numbingly boring but important work improving the tax collection systems of a developing country or fixing the plumbing at a border to make trade easier.

There are currently 30 or so countries that are fragile and weak. These are where many of our biggest problems come from.

  • Communism was a clear and present danger to our way of life then — just as terrorism, drug-financed criminal gangs, and pandemics like Ebola are threats now;
  • Ever since the end of World War II, it has always also been recognized to be in our own interest;
  • This led to relatively modest growth of GDP in these countries during the four-year period the plan was in effect;
  • Given the refusal to participate on the part of the so-called Eastern Bloc of Soviet states, the initiative certainly reinforced divisions that were already beginning to take root on the continent;
  • The plan contributed greatly to the rapid renewal of the western European chemical, engineering, and steel industries;
  • This cooperation sowed the seeds for what became the European Union.

These countries are going to generate such problems for decades. Their challenges are hard to tackle. We have only a small ability to make incremental progress, but the United States needs to be in these countries for their own security and ours.

These nations will require ongoing U.

Keep Exploring Britannica

Can aid be more effective? Can it be managed better?

As we remember the Marshall Plan — that incredible act of enlightened self-interest — let us also recall that our charity of 70 years ago still contributes to U. He currently holds the William A.