Term papers writing service


Conflict styles paper on 12 angry men

Group Conflict in the Film 12 Angry Men

Immigration and diversity seem to have plagued the world now more than ever and it is no surprise that the business world has been changed tremendously. The setting of the movie offers consistency, investment, rigidity, autonomy and fairness in terms of assessing different levels of conflict and negotiation.

I would say that the most evident styles of conflict in the movie are accommodating, compromising and collaborating conflict resolution styles.

  1. They had a business to conduct and everything else was second.
  2. There was evidence presented that an old lady saw the young man kill his father although it was also heard that at the same moment, there was a passing train.
  3. Detached —non emotive Juror nine Juror two Juror eleven Message is delivered in a calm Information is transferred with a and impersonal manner this is degree of passion and equated with objectivity commitment 11.
  4. When juror ten began to go off on a prejudice tangent the remainder of the jury had enough of his slanderous remarks and got up from the table. In the case of the film each man has voting power on the matter and thus has the right to argue his opinion and discuss his thought on the matter.

The jury is involved in a high profile case about a young boy who, if found guilty, then he will be sent to the electric chair. There are several topics that are related to organizational management class that will be portrayed throughout this jury process. The jury, in determining the fate of the young man, who murdered his father, must closely work together and whether consciously or unconsciously, they have been introduced to the forming, storming, norming, performing and transforming, that are involved in the group formation process.

The conflict resolution styles will later work but they were laid in motion by Juror 8. When the movie starts, eleven jurors believe that they have been presented with an easy case to handle. They thought that they would just deliberate and soon everyone will be going home early. Groups that do not agree on goals and are low in cohesiveness tend to have negative results. The goal of the The 12 Angry Men Case Analysis 3 jurors was to reach a decision while operating under constraints.

Their intention was primarily not aimed at destroying one another. There are chances that they might fail to even reach an agreement. In this case, there has to be persuasion, collaboration and even bargaining agreement. The framing in this case nearly worked if had it not been for Juror 8 who introduced argumentative analysis. Framing was used in this case when the evidence pertaining to the knife conflict styles paper on 12 angry men was used as the murder weapon although the defendant has said that he lost it.

The old man said that he was in his apartment when the shouting was taking place, he saw the defendant flee.

  • They are listening to him because he draws from them respect and he also listens to them;
  • The power and influence in the case comes from Juror 8 who sees that there are inconsistencies with the evidence that has been presented and casts a doubt on the guilty verdict;
  • Juror 8 is a skillful and master negotiator.

There was evidence presented that an old lady saw the young man kill his father although it was also heard that at the same moment, there was a passing train. The power and influence in the case comes from Juror 8 who sees that there are inconsistencies with the evidence that has been presented and casts a doubt on the guilty verdict.

They come from all sorts of lives and backgrounds. His premise to stand alone in this process would be equivalent to challenging employees to have the necessary critical thinking skills that are much needed. People possess reference power when others respect and like them.

He could have opted and just gone along like the other jury members.

  • A manager should be in a position that he knows which employees would be the first ones to go and which ones are going to be the last, depending on the date presented to them;
  • The power and influence in the case comes from Juror 8 who sees that there are inconsistencies with the evidence that has been presented and casts a doubt on the guilty verdict;
  • Proactive managers are in better decision making scenarios as they are always critical thinkers and prepared for what the future presents;
  • The 18 stock broker although one of the last to change is vote is also a positional negotiator, he show impartiality as it his intention to make a decision based on the facts;
  • A group is an open and complex system; groups are complex adaptive dynamic, coordinated and bound to norms and patterns in the relations amongst group members, activities and facilities.

He was able to take that lead by letting the people know that they have to ask questions and have satisfactory answers. Once they made a decision, it was going to be hard reversing it. That is why he proposed that thorough follow through with the evidence and witnesses presented before them.

He set a cooperative initiative within the jurors because he listened and gave them the opportunity to share ideas. The requirement that the jury should be unanimous forces the group to bond and start processing the information that they had. Clearly, just like any other conflict within and organization, there were people who were objected to Juror 8 antics but they were open and ready to join the forces of thought.

The conflict and dialogue was constructive. Juror 8 is a skillful and master negotiator. He has a charisma that he employs and let others brainstorm and build alliances. They are listening to him because he draws from them respect and he also listens to them. He has made the group work in unison and think through importance matters. People will respond more openly to a person of passion and dedication.

Leaders need to be able to be a source of inspiration, and be a motivator towards the required action or The 12 Angry Men Case Analysis 5 cause. Although the responsibilities and roles of a leader may be different, the leader needs to be seen to be part of the team working towards the goal. This kind of leader will not be afraid to roll up their sleeves and get dirty.

In the film, Juror 8 shows that he dedicated and committed to the cause. He exhibits qualities of a leader and this takes shape by people listening and soliciting his opinion.

Conflict styles paper on 12 angry men

Just like he challenges them and either agree or disagree. The rules and nature of the case is changed as he shifts them from the normal belief into a new attitude of thinking and processing. If I was doing a remake, then the setting would be changed to incorporate a more realistic change.

This would be done by having women and men both as jurors. I would just add better coloring and give it a modern look but form my viewpoint, the movie was made in 1957 and it is a classic. Considering the time and technology at the time, this movie has stood the test of time and still gets the point across.

3 Types of Conflict

The jurors in this case are diverse. It comes across that the people have been united by only one thing, which is the case. They had a business to conduct and everything else was second.

This case represents a lot of relationships mainly on organizations. Managers and employees are always faced with what are right vs wrong. Most organizations encourage critical thinkers who can move the company forward. Managers are at times faced with difficult decisions like letting employees go or laid off.

A manager should be in a position that he knows which employees would be the first ones to go and which ones are going to be the last, depending on the date presented to them. Proactive managers are in better decision making scenarios as they are always critical thinkers and prepared for what the future presents. In my current organization, we are made up of different teams working on conflict styles paper on 12 angry men deliverables.

There is always bound to be conflict where one or two people can disagree with majority if the people. We always have open discussions that are aimed at having constructive arguments and analysis.

As a leader in the team, I am open to suggestions and feedback from the team. We function as a unit and so asking ourselves questions and having answers is one way by which everyone is encouraged to brainstorm ideas. The jury might be forced to pardon a defendant if the prosecution has not proven its case. In our board room, we are the people who move things and I always make it clear to the group that disagreeing is the basis of excelling and doing a better quality of work.

We are able to think well when stopping and asking ourselves about why we have to do things a certain way, is this agreeable to everyone and lastly, who has a different opinion?

April, 30 2012 "12 Angry Men Study Guide".