Term papers writing service


An argument in favor of miscommunication as the root of worlds problem

Learn how to promote multicultural collaboration. Why is multicultural collaboration important? When should you commit to multicultural collaboration? What are some guidelines for multicultural collaboration? How do you build a multicultural collaboration? As our society becomes more culturally diverse, organizations are understanding the need to work with other organizations in order to "turn up the sound," so their voices are heard and their issues will be addressed.

This means that individuals and institutions can no longer deny the sometimes uncomfortable realities of cultural diversity. Organizers and activists are realizing that we have to come to grips with our multicultural society, or we won't get anything done. But how do we do that? One Wisconsin labor activist says, "We want to include communities of color, but we just don't know where to begin. We hold open meetings, but no people of color even show up. We wanted to make an authentic multicultural organization, but we learned an important lesson -- it doesn't just happen.

These organizers realize they have to develop new strategies and tactics to attract multicultural interest in their collaborative initiatives. They also know there will be problems to solve if their collaborations are to be effective. This section will discuss how to help organizations collaborate effectively with people of different cultures. What is multicultural collaboration?

The Test of Effective Communications

First of all, what's the difference between a coalition, a collaboration, and a multicultural collaboration? A coalition involves two or more organizations working together around an issue or a common set of interrelated issues that they can't address on their own. The purpose is to harness enough influence and resources to have an impact on an issue beyond the grasp of one group alone.

The life of a coalition is usually shorter than the life of the complex issue or issues it faces. When the issue or issues are resolved the coalition disbands and the organizations go their separate ways. Coalition members understand that there will be shared risks, responsibilities, and rewards. The level of commitment is moderate. Diversity in a coalition is a strength as well as a problem because there is often dissension.

A collaboration involves two or more organizations working together on multiple issues and goals in a long-term commitment. This is the highest and most difficult level of working with others, involving formalized organizational relationships.

  • Related to values are the issues of tastes, preferences and interests;
  • Virtually all activities lend themselves to a multicultural approach, including;
  • Due to Anna's memories of the incident getting erased, she has no idea why Elsa shuts her out.

There is a long-term commitment and a focus on a range of issues of wide concern. Turf protection can be high and the ability to let go of control over the direction of the group is critical. Involved organizations share resources develop, implement, and evaluate programsestablish policy, and jointly conduct educational programs.

The core values of collaboration are mutual respect, a valuing of difference, and a high level of trust. A multicultural collaboration is between two or more groups or organizations, each comprised of members from different cultural backgrounds and orientations e.

Workplace Conflicts? 4 Ways to Improve Communication

The cultural differences among groups may consist of ethnic heritage, values, traditions, languages, history, sense of self, and racial attitudes. Any of these cultural features can become barriers to working together.

Unless they become part of the relationship, the collaboration will probably be challenged. Culture is one of the most powerful forces in our world. It's central to what we see, how we make sense of our world, and how we express ourselves. As people from different cultural groups work together, values sometimes conflict.

When we don't understand each other we sometimes react in ways that make a partnership ineffective. Often we're not aware that cultural differences are the root of miscommunication. In an effective multicultural collaboration, as with any other collaboration, the participants must have a sense of common purpose.

But they must consider that different cultural groups may have differing deas about how leaders are chosen and exercise power, and about how conflict and disagreement should be managed. For example, someone from an American Indian tribe may believe that a leader can be respected only if they are an elder, while this may not be an important factor to someone in another group.

A multicultural collaboration requires a plan, lots of patience, and determination to confront old attitudes in new ways by pulling in partners usually not involved.

In order for a multicultural collaboration to be effective, the groups involved must overcome differences to promote a unified effort. Because of different skill levels and expertise, the collaboration may seem uneven at first. And, initially, participants may come for different reasons. For example, some may have been invited to take on responsibilities others don't want; others may want a scapegoat in case things don't work.

But if the focus is on the common goal, shared decision making, defined roles, and setting time lines, the organizations involved can make it work.

  • Most discussions develop into this one;
  • So writing is prone to implicit, and voice prone to explicit miscommunication;
  • Simply adding "I have fragile crap under construction down there" to his sorcery prohibition would prevent Magnus from acting like a moron — between a working webway , alive and loyal Thousand Sons and the fact that most of humanity's knowledge of Warp is a handful of crumbs from Magnus's table, the setback could be minimized even if Horus Heresy happened anyway;
  • The members of all of the groups came together for general membership meetings and selected planning meetings.

It gets everyone to the table. Because most groups have some community-wide concerns, it's essential to get them to the same table, uneven or not.

  1. In it a town has a "treasure" hidden under a mountain, which a valley kingdom covets.
  2. Their brains might, for instance, start out assuming different things about the nature of other intelligent beings. Return to the Sea , Melody is never told why she's not to go beyond the seawall.
  3. Due to the sheer number of words available to choose from, the opportunity for muddled communication is high, even when two people have similarly sized vocabularies. Establish a clear chain of command and corporate policies for how disputes and communication breakdowns are to be handled.
  4. A handy trick for helping to resolve disputes over definitions is to taboo your words. They also know there will be problems to solve if their collaborations are to be effective.
  5. Similar misunderstandings arise at work, in schools, on the playground, and at home.

According to John Gardner, the biggest problem of having many groups in society is the war of the parts against the whole. Though it's odd and self-destructive, in-fighting has increased dramatically in recent years. Becoming more aware of our similarities, along with cultural differences, doesn't an argument in favor of miscommunication as the root of worlds problem to paralyze or divide us.

Through common interests we can learn to translate "different from me" and "less than me" into "like me in lots of important ways. It makes for more effective communication among groups.

Understanding how people communicate is the first step toward understanding and respecting each other. It enriches everyone's life when there is shared knowledge of others' cultures. Different communication styles reflect philosophies and worldviews that are the foundations of cultures. New understanding gives us a broader view of our world and the opportunity to see a mirror image of ourselves. It takes advantage of "strength in numbers. Because no one group is responsible for a problem, no one group alone can solve it.

Competition among groups doesn't aid survival in today's turbulent world. As our population becomes more culturally diverse, some cultural groups are experiencing more problems.

If we learn to an argument in favor of miscommunication as the root of worlds problem and value other cultures and to look at each other as neighbors with similar interests rather than adversaries, we will be more vested in the idea of taking better care of each other. Caring about our neighbors builds a sense of community and unites us in solving community-wide problems. It leads to a more just society. Multicultural collaboration can build collective capacity to help make things better, and promote the consensus that it's important to do so.

This offers a good chance at solving complex problems in an atmosphere of trust, cooperation, and mutual respect. Vicente, a community activist, suggests a way to think about collaborating with people from different cultures: Where do our pasts tie in?

We all come from agrarian backgrounds at some point in our past that are very rich with folklore, history, oral history, and values. In New Mexico we say, 'Mi casa es tu casa.

The following are other significant indicators of when you should commit to multicultural collaboration: Those most affected by the problem are not participating in a solution. This could mean that one group possibly the group in power needs to commit to improving its cultural understanding and appreciation its cultural competence with regard to other groups, in order for those groups to feel welcome.

There is more at stake than individual organizations, but competing organizations are at each other's throats and coming to unilateral decisions that hurt themselves and others. There are problems among many diverse groups that one organization can't solve alone or in a short period of time. There are several groups willing to make a long-term commitment to work for a change in thinking and to establish a common language and effective communication. Several organizations recognize a bad situation that could get worse if nothing is done.

There is a desire to identify others involved in the problem and bring them to the table. Everyone at the table will share a vision and be committed to the process of reaching out to new partners, explaining the rationale, and continuing to recruit group members. All parties involved are clear about what they are getting into, see the tasks as meaningful work that will make a difference, and are strong stakeholder groups in the community.

The groups represent every cultural group involved in the problem, are well organized, and are able to speak and act credibly for the groups they represent. The leadership of the process is committed to keeping the focus on the goals, keeping stakeholders at the table through periods of frustration and disagreement, acknowledging small successes along the way, and enforcing the group's agreed-upon rules.

It's important not to go blindly into a collaboration. Organizations should be aware of the potential problems and to realize that all collaborations may not be voluntary. Circumstances may place organizations in partnerships they may not have anticipated. For example, competition for increasingly limited funds, federal or state mandates for the establishment of initiatives, and social crises may create non-voluntary collaborations.

Forces such as these may turn a step-by-step process of recognition, initiation, structuring, and definition into one giant leap. A giant leap without forethought can lead to a painful fall. Finally, organizations thinking about collaborating must ask themselves, given the potential problems, if they should collaborate at all. Is it an impossible goal? On the other hand, the problems shouldn't scare anyone off if there's potential to work them out with special effort.

There won't be unanimous agreement on everything. That's OK because healthy disagreement can be productive and desirable.

  • Romeo and Juliet sees Juliet faking her own death, and the message to Romeo explaining the situation never reaches him, causing Romeo to kill Paris and commit suicide;
  • Personal contact is important;
  • You might need to operate at the edge of your own comfort zone.

At the same time, there may be lots of ways to work together and experience the many rewards gained through building the relationships needed to do the work. Cultural questions about who we are and how we identify ourselves are at the heart of multicultural collaboration. Consider these guidelines as you confront the communication barriers: Learn from generalizations about other cultures and races, but don't use those generalizations to stereotype, write off, or oversimplify your ideas about another person.