Term papers writing service


A discussion on the significance of civic engagement in america

Other observers have been doubtful about the expected benefits, pointing out that every technological advance has been greeted with the inflated expectations that faster transportation and easier communication will beget citizen empowerment and civic renewal.

This insight leads to the more cautious assessment that, rather than revolutionizing democratic politics, it would end up being more of the same and reinforcing established political patterns and familiar political elites.

Even more sober were those who feared that, far from cultivating social capital, the internet would foster undemocratic tendencies: For a variety of reasons, the internet might be expected to raise participation: The interactive capacities of the internet allow certain forms of political activity to be conducted more easily; vast amounts of political information available on the internet could have the effect of lowering the costs of acquiring political knowledge and stimulating political interest; the capacities of the internet facilitate mobilization to take political action.

However, it is widely known that, with respect to a variety of politically relevant characteristics, political activists are different from the public at large.

Civic engagement

And more participation does not necessarily mean that participants are socially and economically more diverse. Moreover, access to the internet does not necessarily mean use of the internet for political activity. Therefore, it seems important to investigate the extent to which online political and civic activities ameliorate, reflect, or even exaggerate the long-standing tendencies in offline political activity.

There are several ways in which digital tools might facilitate political participation. For one thing, several forms of political activity—including making donations, forming a group of like-minded people, contacting public officials, and registering to vote—are simply easier on the internet.

Because activity can be undertaken any time of day or night from any locale with a computer and an internet connection, the costs of taking part are reduced.

The capacities of the internet are also suited to facilitate the process of the formation of political groups. By making it so cheap to communicate with a large number of potential supporters, the internet reduces the costs of getting a group off the ground. The internet reduces almost to zero the additional costs of seeking to organize many rather than few potential adherents even if they are widely scattered geographically.

Perhaps as important in fostering political activity directly is the wealth of political information available to those who have access to the internet.

  • Such a community is bound together by horizontal relations of reciprocity and cooperation, not by vertical relations of authority and dependency;
  • We will focus on this account here as it provides one of the clearest introductions to what the essential conditions for successful democracy may be;
  • Attaining successful outcomes on toxic issues, which helps elected officials avoid choosing between equally unappealing solutions;
  • Community engagement could be found at;
  • At one level this flies in the face of our expectations;
  • Because this survey was conducted prior to the 2008 presidential elections, the most basic form of civic engagement—voting—is absent from the list of activities we measured for this study.

Just about every offline source of political information is now on the Web, usually without charge: In addition, indigenous to the internet are various potentially politicizing experiences. For example, online conversations, often about political subjects, in a variety of internet venues are in most ways analogous to the political discussions that routinely take place over the dinner table or at the water cooler but have the capacity to bring together large numbers of participants spread over vast distances.

The third mechanism by which the internet might enhance political activity follows directly from its capacity to communicate with large numbers of geographically dispersed people at little cost.

Candidates, parties, and political organizations do not simply use the internet as a way or disseminating information, they also use its capabilities to communicate with adherents and sympathizers and to recruit them to take political action—either on or offline. This report examines the state of civic engagement in America. One major goal of the survey was to compare certain offline political activities—for example, signing petitions or making donations—with their online counterparts.

Another objective was to investigate the possibility of political and civic engagement through blogs and social networking sites. This survey allows us to compare the offline and online worlds in a variety of ways: How and to what extent are digital and online tools being used by Americans to communicate with civic groups, or to engage with the political system?

Are online avenues for political activity bringing new voices and groups into civic and political life? Where do relatively new venues for civic debate such as blogs or social networking sites fit into the overall a discussion on the significance of civic engagement in america of civic and political involvement?

Are these tools bringing new voices into the broader civic debate? All these results come from a national telephone survey of 2,251 American adults including 1,655 internet users conducted between August 12 and August 31, 2008. This sample was gathered entirely on landline phones. There was no extra sample of cell-phone users, who tend to be younger and slightly more likely to be internet users. Nearly two-thirds of all Americans have participated in some form of political activity in the past year.

Just under one-fifth engaged in four or more political acts on a scale of eleven different activities. In attempting to measure the state of political participation in America, we asked about participation in eleven forms of political activity ranging from working with fellow citizens to solve local problems, to participating actively in organizations that try to influence public policy, to volunteering for a political party or candidate.

Our results are consistent with previous research in finding that individuals with high levels of income and education tend to be much more likely to take part politically. As income and education levels increase, so does participation in a wide range of political activities, in particular, working with fellow citizens to solve community problems; attending political meetings; taking part in a civic or political group; attending a political rally or speech; working or volunteering for a political party or candidate; making political contributions; or getting in touch with public officials.

When we consider individual political acts, we sometimes find that a particular subgroup is especially active. For example, those under 30 and English-speaking Hispanics were a discussion on the significance of civic engagement in america likely to have attended an organized protest in the previous twelve months; suburbanites were more likely to have attended a political meeting on local, town, or school affairs; and fifty and sixty-somethings were especially likely to have contacted a government official.

Otherwise, the group differences on the basis of gender, age, race or ethnicity, kind of community are much less substantial than the differences on the basis of income or, especially, education. Among those individuals who are involved in a community or political group: Furthermore, among those who are involved in a political or community group: Nearly half of all Americans have expressed their opinions in a public forum on topics that are important to them, and blogs and social networking sites provide new opportunities for political engagement.

Over this time period: As the numbers above indicate, many people engage in civic communications using multiple channels—for instance, they may sign a paper petition for one issue and an online petition for another—and certain types of communications are especially likely to take place online.

  • The American Democracy Project also sponsors campus-based initiatives including voter registration, curriculum revision projects, and special days of action and reflection, such as the MLK Day of Service;
  • Candidates, parties, and political organizations do not simply use the internet as a way or disseminating information, they also use its capabilities to communicate with adherents and sympathizers and to recruit them to take political action—either on or offline;
  • The argument was then developed that not only did a reserve of social capital enhance the functioning of political institutions and social organizations — it also fostered economic growth;
  • Nearly half of all Americans have expressed their opinions in a public forum on topics that are important to them, and blogs and social networking sites provide new opportunities for political engagement;
  • Citizenship in the civic community entails equal rights and obligations for all;
  • In the last decades of the twentieth century in US debates especially there was a growing interest in republican themes.

Letters to the editor are most commonly sent via email: In contrast, among those who have signed a petition more than half signed a paper petition only. Interestingly, the method citizens use to contact government officials appears to have little relationship to whether or not they receive a response, or whether they are satisfied with the result of their communication.

With the rise of the blogosphere, social networking sites and other online tools, interested citizens can now take part in the online community of political and civic activists by posting their own commentary on social issues online. In addition to the possibilities for posting content on blogs and other websites, social networking sites have also become fertile ground for engagement with the political process.

As we shall see, the nature of this online activism differs in some important respects from the other civic or political activities discussed in this report. In 2008, Americans were frequently asked — and, in turn, asked others — to take part in political activities.

For a small share of the public, email functioned in 2008 as a key tool for daily political communication and mobilization.

  • Our results are consistent with previous research in finding that individuals with high levels of income and education tend to be much more likely to take part politically;
  • In the past few years, there has been a lot of talk and a lot written about the fact that Americans' participation in civic life—or "civic engagement"— has declined dramatically;
  • Many claim that civic engagement ought to become part of the curriculum and that higher education institutions should provide opportunities to become engaged such as internships, service-learning, and community based activities;
  • Few people aspire to partake in deliberations about the commonweal, and few such opportunities present themselves;
  • There are several ways in which digital tools might facilitate political participation;
  • Online engagement gives citizens the opportunity to be involved in their local government that they would not have otherwise, by allowing them to voice themselves from the comfort of their own home.

Supporters of the Democratic Party led the way in online giving. However, Democratic donors were far more likely than their Republican counterparts to donate money over the internet. Compared to political donors, charitable donors are less likely to go online to make their contributions, but charitable donors are more likely to make a large contribution over the internet. Compared to political donations, donations to non-profit and charitable organizations excluding places of worship are far more likely to take place offline.

Civic community and civic engagement

This is nearly identical to the rates for those who made an offline political donation: Although online and offline political donors do not differ significantly at the low end of the contribution scale, larger political contributions are confined primarily to the offline world. This tendency for large political donations to occur offline is especially interesting when compared to donations to non-profit institutions or charitable causes.

Those who make charitable donations are less likely one the whole to make online donations than are political donors. Nevertheless, in contrast to political donors, who are less likely to make a large contribution if they are contributing on the internet, charitable contributors are equally likely to make large contributions regardless of whether they are donating online or offline.

For whatever reason, the tendency of political donors to make large contributions offline is not apparent when it comes to charitable giving.

Because this survey was conducted prior to the 2008 presidential elections, the most basic form of civic engagement—voting—is absent from the list of activities we measured for this study.

  1. Edwin Fogelman, author of Civic Engagement at the University of Minnesota, states that true civic engagement can only be practiced by those living within a Democracy.
  2. Shah writes that Putnam found the more TV a person watches, the less they are active in outside activities. Department of Education and the American Association of Colleges and Universities, the authors argue that higher education must serve as an intellectual incubator and socially responsible partner in advancing civic learning and democratic engagement.
  3. Local civic engagement[ edit ] When those who serve listen to the citizens, they become better informed of what is needed by the community and generally make better decisions. The interactive capacities of the internet allow certain forms of political activity to be conducted more easily; vast amounts of political information available on the internet could have the effect of lowering the costs of acquiring political knowledge and stimulating political interest; the capacities of the internet facilitate mobilization to take political action.