Term papers writing service


A biography of joan of arc a french historical figure

Kieran Creedon, review of Joan of Arc: A History, review no. The Plantagenets would have reigned over England and France, which would have formed one territory, as it did in prehistoric times before the Channel existed, populated by one race.

Saint Joan of Arc

France, exhausted by bloodlettings, and ravaged a few years earlier by the plague, was on her knees. In Joan of Arc: A History Castor spins out the threads of the story of La Pucelle and weaves them into an intricate pattern, illustrating the precise difference that the arrival and acceptance of Joan in March 1429 at the court of the dauphin the future King Charles VII made to the course of the history of two warring nations.

  1. All this had its limitations. His counselors gave him conflicting advice; but two days later he granted her an audience.
  2. A full comparison of the French and Latin records would no doubt be revealing. Castor sets out her approach as follows.
  3. Wells, New York, NY, 1965 , p. Although he returned full of enthusiasm for the Maid and her mission, the townsfolk decided to remain loyal to the Anglo-Burgundian regime.

Quarter of a century later the winds had changed and there was another trial known as the Nullification Trial which declared her a martyr and paved the way for her eventual canonization in 1920. Joan is one of the most well documented people of the medieval period.

Victories and coronation

If Joan had not already existed, one is tempted to say that the Medievals would have had to invent her. Castor sets out her approach as follows: There seems little purpose, for example, in attempting to diagnose in her a physical or psychological disorder that might, to us, explain her voices, if the terms of reference we use are completely alien to the landscape of belief in which she lived p.

The Prologue is a vivid tapestry set at the battle of Agincourt in October 1415, cinematic in its sweep, graphic in its battlefield descriptions: John the Fearless or Jean sans Peur was assassinated by the Armagnacs at Montereau on 10 September 1419 and this pivotal moment is portrayed in suitably dramatic fashion.

Castor tells us with a dry sense of understatement: The temptation to believe Joan must have been overwhelming.

Joan of Arc

There had been precedents for women claiming to have divinely inspired visions and hearing heavenly voices and Castor provides some relevant examples but Joan was deemed to be the real thing and this was attested to by no less an authority than the renowned scholar Jean Gerson — or at the very least Gerson did not stand in the way in his own pronouncements on the process of discretio spirituum the discernment of spirits in order to tell whether Joan was speaking for God or for the devil.

The miracle had happened. The threat that the English might snatch this key to the Loire was lifted. A seventeen-year-old peasant girl knew nothing of war: Yet Joan had known what she would do. The learned doctors at Poitiers had asked for a sign, and it had come, heaven-sent.

  1. Castor is continuously alert to the presence of political pragmatism and the desire for self-advancement; she renders effectively the sense that once you start to pull at one thread of any legal process, it is only a matter of time before the entire fabric can be made to come apart and on 7 July 1456 there was a declaration of nullification.
  2. But if I were in a state of sin, do you think the Voice would come to me? The effects of the Western Schism 1378—1417 and the decline of papal authority during the Conciliar Movement 1409—49 made it difficult for persons to seek independent arbitration and judgment in cases relating to the faith.
  3. Canonisation Rouen and Paris were later recaptured by the French, and in 1456 the Inquisition held a retrial of Joan's case in the cathedral of Notre Dame.
  4. Many other towns were also liberated from English control and it allowed a triumphal entry into Dauphin for the coronation of King Charles VII on 17 July 1429. Charles was now desperate enough that he would have listened to almost anyone.

Her elucidation of complex trial records is a key strength of the book, and the game of cat and mouse that evolves between divinely-inspired Joan and her learned interrogators is presented in such a way as to render dense theological points accessible to a general readership whilst retaining the innate, necessary drama of such set-pieces.

The issue of Joan's heresy still dogged the King; therefore a process was initiated to discredit the proceedings of nineteen years earlier. Castor is continuously alert to the presence of political pragmatism and the desire for self-advancement; she renders effectively the sense that once you start to pull at one thread of any legal process, it is only a matter of time before the entire fabric can be made to come apart and on 7 July 1456 there was a declaration of nullification: For the people of the Middle Ages, the pervasive nature of God is absolute and to attempt to understand them it is necessary to accept this.

Castor combines a consummate skill for storytelling with the cogent precision of a trial lawyer, dissecting complex medieval relations and conflicts and rendering them accessible for a general readership.

For those who may be more familiar with this period of medieval history, the book is an elegant and thought-provoking reminder of the manner in which edifices of power behave when threatened with obstruction in the quest for dominance.

Joan of Arc’s Early Life

The book does not attempt to psychoanalyse Joan or further complexify her in terms of her various, mutable, memorial and cultural legacies. So what, in the end, was Joan — Military leader? She was, perhaps, all of these things — protean product of her time, apotheosis of theological and military imperatives, ultimately doomed. She was an invention, partly of others, partly of her own making, fully of the Middle Ages.

Joan of Arc: a History by Helen Castor, review:

Meanwhile another marvellous apparition had occurred: If we read the remarkable records of a wholly exceptional life in the knowledge of how those documents came to be made, if we immerse ourselves in her cultured, brutal and terrifying uncertain world, assured of nothing but the supreme force of Gods will, then perhaps we can begin to understand Joan herself: Terry Hale, London, 2001p.

He later turned to demonic occult pursuits and was charged with multiple counts of child murder and sodomy as well as heresy.

He was convicted and killed by hanging in October 1440. Back to 2 Huysmans, p.

  • The verdicts of the Inquisition were liable to be coloured by political and other influences; and Joan was not the only victim of an essentially unjust procedure, which allowed the accused no counsel for the defense and which sanctioned interrogation under duress;
  • I should be the saddest in all the world if I knew that I were not in the grace of God;
  • In the 1420s, it was perfectly possible to live in Rouen and feel that it was morally right to see the Plantagenets as the natural rulers of France as well as England, while the colourless Armagnac prince skulking in central France was mocking God with his claim to the French throne.

Wells, New York, NY, 1965p. The Secret History of Joan of Arc and Yolande of Aragon London, 2011 for a recent exploration of the relationship between the two women.

Joan of Arc Biography

Castor makes her views on Yolande's goals clear on p. Charles VII retained only one point: A full comparison of the French and Latin records would no doubt be revealing.

When we consider that, in becoming a figure of a nation, she was sacrificed to that nation, then she seems not unlikely but impossible. She seems far too unstable a figure to stand, as such, for anything: Arthur Goldhammer, London, 1980pp. Back to 10 Barbara W. Back to 11 May 2015 Related reviews.