Term papers writing service


The conflict between the characters of pavel and bazarov in the book fathers and children

Fathers and Sons Children and Sons Mikhail Morgulis remarked to me that children will not listen to thier parents, but they will watch. It is not our words, but our actions that determine how we will be judged.

Brazarov is perhaps the most obvious example of contradiction. He preaches his nihilist ideals of believing in nothing even going so far as to having followers and later breaches his non-principles by falling in love.

He seems to hold fast to his rules in his appearance of ambivalence towards Anna, but as the reader sees, he is inwardly conflicted. Arcady, on the other hand, has a less convincing case. He is also an emotional character, almost coming to tears on a few occasions.

On the one had, as I have already mentioned, Nicholas has this specific set of morals he talks of taking in Fenichka as the right thing to do but then catches himself treating her like a peasant and does not marry her. Sorry Sophie…I went over the word limit….

Casey Mahoney March 16th, 2009 3: Even though the nihilists, along with the foil they find in the ultra-ordered Odintsova, too, want to take emotion out of the equation, the fact that they are biologically humans after their fathers—that is, the fact they are specimens meant to reason and emote—makes this desire seem ludicrous and impossible. As much as actions speak louder than words, I disagree that words and intentions have no bearing on judgment. Lisa Eppich March 16th, 2009 4: The father and son relationship between Arkady and Nikolai is particularly interesting: Arkady is clearly respectful of his father, and the two share many emotional traits.

He looks up to Bazarov like an older brother, and because Bazarov is a rather overbearing person, Arkady is largely treated like an inferior. However, Arkady has been persuaded that nihilism is the wave of the future, and therefore he tries to validate himself in front of Bazarov.

Arkady therefore adopts nihilism to appeal to Bazarov and to try and fit in with his generation, even though it is greatly outside of his true nature. Similarly, Nikolai looks up to his son. Because of all these facades, the two men have a misunderstanding of their own roles: Yet, their true emotions show that they not only have the same beliefs as one another, but that their relationship is paramount to both of them, as much as they try to hide it.

Jennifer Ridder March 16th, 2009 5: The overall structure of the novel is seen through the journeys home that the young students make. But by keeping the title constantly in mind, we see that the author is building their trials and tribulations around the two sons and their relationship with their fathers.

This allows the reader to perceive large and sweeping contrasts of fathers and sons. Through the passages we learn of the inter-generational conflict that profoundly affects the characters and their attitudes to life.

In some instances the sons reflect their fathers and others they are determined to rebel. In passion, the sons are like their warm-hearted fathers. They mirror love like that of a father for his son, and the sons for their lovers. However, the fathers are aware of such differences and question whether they themselves inhibit or promote such displays.

Nikolai Petrovitch looked angry him and sank into his chair overcome by confusion. His heart began to throb. Did he at that moment realize the inevitable strangeness of the futures relations between him and his son? Was he conscious that Arkady would perhaps have shown him more respect if he had never touched on this subject at all? Fathers are forced to see that they influence their sons. By Nikolai relenting to the idea of his son and Fedosya he opened the door to the illicit lover of his son despite his true desires.

If he had not said anything though, perhaps Adady would have just rebelled and gone after her or perhaps followed his the conflict between the characters of pavel and bazarov in the book fathers and children indifference.

Instead by the father caring of Arkady, Arkady is compelled to care for someone else. So though, the fathers and sons are navigating a generational divide the sons are still influenced by a fathers actions. Anonymous March 16th, 2009 6: A few times Bazarov and other modern intelectuals make fun of him, telling him to listen to Katya play the piano because he is the only one who has any regards for music or art.

Bazarov plays the role of a leader. He is supposed to be themost radical nihlist or most unorthodox. Bazarov went walking in the woods or the fields every morning, he went to the pond as well. He justified these actions by saying they were purely scientific analysis, and he only wanted to get frog specimen. However he continues to spend a great deal of time outdoors.

He talks long walks in the garden with Odintsova everday at her house. Although he claims to have no appreciation for art, nature, or beauty, judging from the amount of time he spends in nature, I would say he values it quite a bit.

Of course we are also shown blatently Stewart Moore March 16th, 2009 6: He seems to be at odds with his beliefs quite a great dealand this is why he feels so much inner anguish. He is less of a nihlist than he would like to admit. Catherine Ahearn March 16th, 2009 7: Although it may appear the conflict between the characters of pavel and bazarov in the book fathers and children to believe in nothing and feel little, it is not part of human nature to do so.

The very belief in nihilism is a contradiction to nihilism itself. I think Turgenev does a great job at making this tension clear as the book progresses. However, the first instance that we see him and his detachment challenged, it waivers and finally falls at the feet of Anna. He loves her and says so, therefore he feels and believes and in doing so reveals the person by which he should be judged.

Had Anna requited his love I would say that she is like Bazarov, but she does not at least not yet and so serves as a great character by which we can juxtapose and judge Barazov. The difference between Anna and Bazarov is that the later believed he understood himself, when he did not.

Kara Shurmantine March 16th, 2009 8: Her post helped me realize the reason I disliked Bazarov so much: My belief is that a great philosophical idea should not work in absolutes: Nothing in life is absolute, nothing is black and white—if a philosophy claims to have the absolute answer to something, or to reject or uphold any idea or principle in absolute terms, that philosophy is being false to the very nature of life itself.

It forces him into rejecting everything, even his own private and very real impulses towards affection and romance when Anna stirs his heart. But I cannot forgive him for the callousness with which he has treated his elders, and with which he has encouraged Arkady to treat his father. Alexandra Boillot March 16th, 2009 8: Bazarov stands out as the worst violator of his own philosophy because he so vehemently states his views and says he is a true nihilist.

Arkady, on the other hand, never declares his belief in nihilism as explicitly as Bazarov does and instead seems to believe more in Bazarov than his actual philosophy. Nicholas is the weakest example because his actions going against his traditional ideals are only in an attempt to close the gap between him and his son.

Bazarov states that he believes in nothing and strongly criticizes all romantics and any actions that could be perceived as romantic. Showing emotion in general, then, and especially falling in love blatantly violate nihilism. However, Bazarov falls in love with Odintsova and even tells her that he loves her. Although he struggles internally with his feelings for her since they are in clear violation of everything he stands for, he cannot stop them.

Arkady definitely seems to be in more awe of Bazarov himself than of his philosophy. Although his way of life is clearly traditional he does try to at least learn what more progressive people believe Russian society should be like so he can close the generational gap between himself and Arkady. Zachary Harris March 16th, 2009 8: Bazarov and Arkady have good reason to discount the liberal values of the older generation because of the apparent lack of ability of this generation to enact any serious reforms.

Yet they face an impossible task in assigning no value to anything. Arkady by no means truly believes in the nihilist cause as he wants his father to marry Fenichka, truly does love nature, and represses many feelings so that Bazarov does not know his true attachment to things.

He finds the idea of nihilism very enticing, but in no way is capable of living by its tenets. Bazarov too is incapable of truly discounting the value of all things. He seems to primarily strive to be a nihilist because he sees the faults in old liberalism and finds joy in shocking people with his way of thinking. This is evident in the way he greatly frustrates Pavel when Pavel questions his beliefs. However, Bazarov, as was said before, clearly finds many things worth valuing, such as conducting science experiments, discussing his ideas, and the mystical idea that the nihilist viewpoint will soon gain adherents and lead to a positive reformation of Russia.

I feel that this novel essentially, at least so far, is showing the problem in Russia that the intellectuals can do nothing to reform their society and that because of this people will begin to develop radical ideologies in an attempt to make an impact on their society.

This is shown to be equally ineffective as the nihilists are incapable of actually implementing their philosophy into the way they live. Anonymous March 16th, 2009 8: It is hilarious that you posted that anonymously and was wrong.

Fathers and Sons

Kaylen Baker March 16th, 2009 9: Bazarov really does try though, and when he falls in love with Anna he fights against it as much as possible.

He has an intrinsic outlook that he projects into his view of the world, and is compelling enough to make others believe him. Bazarov distains the aristocrats, because they think they are better while nihilists see all humans as the same. But why does Bazarov distain the peasants as well? The concordances should be recognized too. Pavel thinks respect is the most important thing a man can have and give, which is why Bazarov disturbs him.

  • After seeing her he died in peace;
  • She was forced to learn how to take care of the estate and deal with her angry, selfish aunt all on her own;
  • Pavel thinks respect is the most important thing a man can have and give, which is why Bazarov disturbs him;
  • Also, Arkady is attracted to Anna, and not ashamed of his feelings;
  • He is then shown as very passive, having allowed his emotion grab hold of his thoughts;
  • Of course we are also shown blatently Stewart Moore March 16th, 2009 6:

He even stands up for his father and uncle against Bazarov. Arcady inherited his daydreamer sensibility from his father, who, as a romantic, refuses to offend and dictate over anyone. Harry Morgenthau March 16th, 2009 9: Neither one of them is a strong-willed idealist like Pavel or Bazarov, but in their own, smaller ways, they manage to be very reliable.