Term papers writing service


Should transportation security tsa regulation be changed

Ross Borden, Feature photo: As these new, stricter, procedures were rolled out in airports across the US during the last few weeks, the internet buzzed with horrific stories of women being forced to remove prosthetic breastsa bladder cancer survivor being covered in urine after a TSA pat down, and a young boy having his shirt removed during a secondary screening. Americans are questioning whether this invasion of privacy and personal rights — having to choose between getting a nude image of yourself produced or basically being groped in public — is worth it.

Not only are the TSA security procedures not worth the hassle, but they are simply just not effective at doing what they are supposed to do, which is find and prevent terrorist attacks. Here are 10 reasons why: Jared and Corin 1.

At many international airports like San Francisco Internationalonly one full body scanner is located at each major entrance to the departure gates.

  1. Here are 10 reasons why.
  2. Israel is known to have some of the toughest airport security and one of the best track records on travel safety.
  3. After all, there are still plenty of people that still seem surprised that you must put your carry-on liquids in 3-ounce containers or that you have to take your shoes off when going through a security check point.
  4. As these new, stricter, procedures were rolled out in airports across the US during the last few weeks, the internet buzzed with horrific stories of women being forced to remove prosthetic breasts , a bladder cancer survivor being covered in urine after a TSA pat down, and a young boy having his shirt removed during a secondary screening.
  5. There has not been sufficient review of the intermediate and long-term effects of radiation exposure associated with airport scanners.

In one incidentseveral people opted out of the body scanners and were just sent through metal detectors instead. If a passenger had something to hide, he or she could walk through the line for the metal detector instead of the scanner. Alternatively, a passenger with ill intent could simply board an aircraft at an airport or terminal that does not utilize the scanners. Airports can legally opt out of TSA services and hire private security instead In addition, airports are under no obligation to utilize TSA services; they can hire private security companies instead.

TSA

This means that some airline passengers will be screened by TSA agents, while others will not be. Once a passenger boards a domestic flight, he usually does not have to go through security again even if he catches a connecting flight in another city. If airports administrators exercise their right to hire private security, people flying out of those airports will then be transferred to other airports, and passengers on a single plane may have been subject to vastly different security measures.

If you look at all the recent terrorist incidents, the bombs were detected because of human intelligence not because of screening … If even a fraction of what is spent on screening was invested in the intelligence services we would take a real step toward making air travel safer and more pleasant.

Homework Help - Post Questions, Assignments & Papers

TSA procedures focus on finding objects, and they tend to be one step behind the terrorists What TSA does is often based on a response to the previous threat. Liquid explosives are found, and so now we must all meticulously organize our 100 ml bottles of shampoo in zip-lock baggies. TSA protocol leaves passengers more vulnerable Discarding all liquids supposedly because they could be explosiveand then keeping them stored in a trash bin right there where hundreds of people are wrapped around the line makes little, if any, logical sense.

Increased wait times at security checkpoints create greater risk In addition, TSA security checks tend to be time consuming particularly with the pat down option and result in long lines at completely unsecured security checkpoints.

If someone wanted to wreak havoc at an airport, all he would have to do is approach a security gate and detonate a bomb right there. The US should learn from the example of Israel, where getting passengers through different layers of security happens quickly and with much less hassle. The new imaging machines do not detect all explosives Former chief security officer of the Israel Airport Authority, Rafi Sela, has expressed doubt about the capabilities of these machines: Money spent on current TSA staff and procedures is a waste of resources and is making private companies rich off of fear-mongering The TSA payroll includes over 67,000 employees and continues to grow.

How the TSA Is Fighting a Tech War With Terrorists

At the same time, although the TSA is a federal government organization, many privately-held, for-profit companies are making significant profits due to these security increases. This money would be much better spent on having a smaller, more highly trained staff and focusing more on intelligence gathering and less on screening. This scenario could ultimately pan out, as according to the National Safety Councilthe average American has a 1 in 85 chance of dying in a car accident during his or her entire lifetime, while the odds of dying in an air or space travel related accident are 1 in 5,862.

A group of faculty from the University of California at San Francisco put together a report that ultimately states: There has not been sufficient review of the intermediate and long-term effects of radiation exposure associated with airport scanners.

Trending in Travel

There is good reason to believe that these scanners will increase the risk of cancer to children and other vulnerable populations. Rothschild put together some statistics detailing the odds of actually dying in an airplane hijacked by a terrorist. In any given year, an American with an average life span has a 1 in 400 chance of dying from heart disease, a 1 in 600 chance of dying from cancer and a 1 in 7,000 chance of dying in an automobile accident.

Let us assume that each week one commercial aircraft were hijacked and crashed.

  1. While tightening defenses at the international gateways and larger, busier airports makes sense, in any war, the most vulnerable point is the weakest link. Let us assume that each week one commercial aircraft were hijacked and crashed.
  2. The new imaging machines do not detect all explosives Former chief security officer of the Israel Airport Authority, Rafi Sela, has expressed doubt about the capabilities of these machines.
  3. A group of faculty from the University of California at San Francisco put together a report that ultimately states. Israel is known to have some of the toughest airport security and one of the best track records on travel safety.
  4. In one incident , several people opted out of the body scanners and were just sent through metal detectors instead.

What are the odds that a person who goes on one trip per month would be in that plane? If there were only one hijacked plane per month, the odds would be about 540,000 to 1.

11 Reasons the TSA is NOT Making Us Safer, and Why It Needs to be Reformed NOW

If we refuse to be terrorized, if we refuse to implement security theater and remember that we can never completely eliminate the risk of terrorism, then the terrorists fail even if their attacks succeed.

Have you had any first-hand experiences that would testify one way or the other?