Term papers writing service


An overview of the history of the church of jesus of latter day saint lds

We often say things like the Lutheran Church can't be God's church because it is named after a man, Martin Luther. The word 'Catholic' just means universal.

Baptists are said to be named after John the Baptist. The Latter-day part added to show that it is not the original church that Christ established around 30 AD, but rather Christ's restored church in this dispensation. The Book of Mormon says that the true church must have the name of Christ in it.

Additional Resources

For if a church be called in Moses' name then it be Moses' church; or if it be called in the name of a man then it be the church of a man; but if it be called in my name then it is my church, if it so be that they are built upon my gospel. Lord, we will that thou wouldst tell us the name whereby we shall call this church; for there are disputations among the people concerning this matter. And the Lord said unto them: Verily, verily, I say unto you, why is it that the people should murmur and dispute because of this thing?

Have they not read the scriptures, which say ye must take upon you the name of Christ, which is my name? For by this name shall ye be called at the last day; And whoso taketh upon him my name, and endureth to the end, the same shall be saved at the last day. Therefore, whatsoever ye shall do, ye shall do it in my name; therefore ye shall call the church in my name; and ye shall call upon the Father in my name that he will bless the church for my sake.

And how be it my church save it be called in my name? Verily I say unto you, that ye are built upon my gospel; therefore ye shall call whatsoever things ye do call, in my name; therefore if ye call upon the Father, for the church, if it be in my name the Father will hear you; And if it so be that the church is built upon my gospel then will the Father show forth his own works in it.

History of the Church

But if it be not built upon my gospel, and is built upon the works of men, or upon the works of the devil, verily I say unto you they have joy in their works for a season, and by and by the end cometh, and they are hewn down and cast into the fire, from whence there is no return. On April 6, 1830, LDS church leaders met together presumably to fulfill the requirements of the laws of the land, and they named their church consistent with the admonition of the Book of Mormon, "The Church of Christ.

LDS Media Library

The hyphen in 'Latter-day' was add about a century or so later to be grammatically correct. The chronology of the name is: Church of Christ 1834: The Church of the Latter Day Saints 1838: We obeyed His commandment, and called it The Church of Christ until 1834, when, through the influence of Sydney Rigdon, the name of the church was changed to The Church of the Latter Day Saints, dropping out the name of Christ entirely.

After all, Paul refers to it as "the church of the Thessalonians"! Consider also that Paul refers to the body of believers in Corinth as "the church of God which is at Corinth" See 1 Corinthians 1: Response by the Church We regret that we could not find this issue discussed comprehensively in any church publication or website.

True believing member response. Richard Lloyd Anderson, a professor of religion and history at Brigham Young Universityattempted to explain the 1834 change. He says, "This alteration was not seen as a de-emphasis of Christ; on the contrary, it was done in hopes that the name of the Church would more clearly reflect the fact that Christ was at its head" A Sure Foundation, pg. How dropping the name of Christ in order to "reflect the fact that Christ was at its head" seems confusing at best.

Anderson feels justified by the fact that, even though the official title of the church omitted the name of Christ, it was still known in the minds of many as the Church of Christ and so he argues that the church's name had really never changed.

Not all are in agreement with this conclusion as is seen by the writings of Book of Mormon witness David Whitmer: It would be easier for Anderson to admit that the LDS Church spent much of its first decade without having the name of Jesus in its title. Does this make it an apostate church? If the Mormon answers "no," then the argument made today based upon 3 Nephi 27: This name, Anderson adds, is "descriptive of divine restoration" indicating "Jesus is at its head.

It is hypocritical of Mormons who condemn Christian churches for not having the name of Christ in their official title when their church has not always had that distinction. Also, many other churches use Christ in their name so the LDS Church is hardly unique in that regard including several churches known as the 'Church of Christ' which had that name long before the LDS church was first named in 1830. They offered this response regarding the name change issue: Much is made of the name of the Church by its missionaries, who claim that there was no church on the face of the earth called "The Church of Jesus Christ" when the "church" was restored in 1830.

What is the explanation for the fact that the Church changed its name twice in the first eight years of its existence? According to The Book of Mormon 3 Nephi 27: Response by John A.

This name change did not come as a result of revelation, but by vote. Significantly, when the Lord finally did speak in 1838, it was the name he gave the church that became official and has remained so ever since. The question itself distorts what the Book of Mormon says, by leaving out the context of 3 Nephi 27: From this, it is clear that Christ did not name the Church he established among the Nephites until after the Church had already begun growing in numbers.

This is parallel to what happened in the latter-day Church, when different names were applied until the Lord himself revealed precisely how the Church should be named. In the case of both the Nephite and latter-day Churches, the question of the name was not settled until Christ revealed his will. Two other points should be made: For some reason, there were disagreements about the precise name that should be used.

Moreover, the name of the Church, while important, is not what makes the Church true or false. Being built on the gospel of Christ and having authority from him is far more important than the name of the Church.

The editors of this section give their own opinion: Is it reasonable to an overview of the history of the church of jesus of latter day saint lds that God would periodically change the name of his church? If Jesus Christ is the central character of God's religion on earth and all things are to be done in his name, is it reasonable to assume that God would instruct his church leaders to entirely leave out the name of Christ from the period of May 3, 1834 to April 26, 1838?

If Jesus is really the head of the LDS Church then what possible reason could there be for the name changes? Why would Jesus instruct Joseph as to the name in 1830 then change it in 1834 and then change it again in 1838?

Quick Links

Why wouldn't Jesus get it right the first time? We can't understand why he would take the name of Christ completely out of the name of the church for four whole years. One possible reason is that the Church is really run entirely by men without any real instruction or revelation from God.

If they couldn't even get the name right for eight years then what else might be wrong? Sidney Rigdon's role If we take David Whitmer's assertion that Sidney Rigdon helped influence Joseph to change the name of the church, then that causes additional questions to be asked.

  1. After all, Paul refers to it as "the church of the Thessalonians"! The current temple, which was built to resemble the original, was dedicated in 2002.
  2. Consider also that Paul refers to the body of believers in Corinth as "the church of God which is at Corinth" See 1 Corinthians 1. They believe that from Mary, a mortal woman, Jesus inherited the capacity to die, and from God, an exalted being, he inherited the capacity to live forever.
  3. The name Latter-day stems from the belief that after the death of the early apostles, the Christian church fell into apostasy.
  4. He was commanded to join none of the existing churches and was told that God would restore to earth the Church originally organized by Jesus Christ, with all of its truths and priesthood authority. How dropping the name of Christ in order to "reflect the fact that Christ was at its head" seems confusing at best.

Why would the prophet of the church, who had formed and already served as president of the church for four years, agree to changing the name merely by having one of his counselors suggest it? This may support some critic's assertions that Sidney Rigdon was a much bigger influence in creating the church than commonly taught. The name Mormon Although the LDS Church's official name is not Mormon and the leadership has done its best to have the world refer to it by the current official name or the name 'Church of Christ', the vast majority of the world still only knows the LDS Church as the 'Mormon Church'.

We can't help but wonder if it is really all part of Heavenly Father's divine plan to have his Son's church be known by a nickname?

  • Consider also that Paul refers to the body of believers in Corinth as "the church of God which is at Corinth" See 1 Corinthians 1;
  • If the Mormon answers "no," then the argument made today based upon 3 Nephi 27: