Term papers writing service


An argument in favor of raising the minimum age for a driving license

The accidents may just be delayed by one year By raising the age it does not guarantee that accidents will decrease. They may simply just be delayed by one year as drivers are having accidents a year later. This would be the case if the accidents were caused primarily by lack of experience as opposed to age. In addition, carrying out any change just to see if it works is generally a poor idea. If it is not broken, do not fix it. Only by carrying out the change will we be able to see if it works or not.

The age has a lot to do with driving. When they are 15-17 and still in high school the pressure with school, friends, and daily emotions at that age can distract the young drivers to the point of an accident.

Yes, "Only by carrying out the change will we be able to see if it works or not" is a poor idea but with the statistics of many young drivers and accidents, it proves that the age should rise up. People will never know unless they try. It removes the freedom of young people Without personal mobility, young people are restricted as to where they go and when they go. This not only has implications for the human rights of young people, but may have further reaching impacts such as a hit on the economy if younger people find that their ability to work is constrained.

Restrict the freedom of young people? Freedom is everything to young people. If you take that away then what do they have? Just because someone is young doesn't mean they are incapable of driving safe. In fact the younger the driver the more they learn.

  1. Raising the driving age to 21 would be a much better idea.
  2. Researchers for the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety say the answer is no, and they point to statistics to back up the position that raising the driving age makes sense and would save lives. Not every person—teenage or otherwise—is identical.
  3. He said, "I think it would be better to wait," but he needed his license as soon as possible. No matter at what age people start driving, they will have accidents because they have little experience.

If you do this, this may cause more teenagers to drive illegally. Surely it's worth restricting the freedom of young people in order to preserve their lives and the lives of others. Freedom is no good to you if you've been paralysed in a car accident or killed your best friend. I agree with this comment.

States Urged To Raise The Driving Age

If you do take some freedom from the young teenagers it only helps them to be stronger later on and more maturer. If you give the young teenagers too much freedom, it only causes them to do what ever they want to the point of dissobeying the rules which their parents give and the goverenment. In addition to the comment, "In fact the younger the driver the more they learn.

This only gives more trauma to the younger people. There are alternatives — such as making tests more rigorous Instead of simply raising the minimum age, alternative proposals could be made. These could include making tests harder to pass, imposing a compulsory number of practise hours or legislating new restrictions on young drivers once they have passed such as not being able to drive at night.

All of these alternatives have their own pros and cons and should be considered in conjunction with a change in the minimum age. The alternatives to making a test harder is still not a good way to keep the young teenagers from driving reckless. There are many smart teenagers that can pass a test but it is different when getting behind the wheel by themselves or with other passengers.

Peoples minds at a young age are very distracted with a lot of information from school, friends, and parents. In addition, there are many pros to raise the age so why don't we try it? Raising the driving age to 21 would be a much better idea. The difference between 17 and 18 is insignificant, if you want to make a real difference to accidents cause by inexperienced, immature and unimaginative drivers then a more radical change is necessary.

It would be possible to offer free or heavily subsidised travel on public transport for young people up to the age of 21 which would encourage more environmentally friendly attitudes in the next generation. Raising the driving age to 21 would be an argument in favor of raising the minimum age for a driving license over extension because it the voting age in the UK is 18, when a person is recognised as an adult for a lot of different things including the right to vote.

To have the driving age raised above that would be patronising to young people and probably generate a backlash in the form of less environmentally friendly attitudes. Parents can provide guidance to their teens While a teenager is still living at home, parents can provide them with guidance and assistance in the process of learning to drive.

Parents can supervise them when they are practicing, and teach them certain basic safety rules. This may lead them to learn from less experienced drivers such as their peers of the same age, or even attempt to teach themselves without instruction. This is undoubtedly very dangerous and potentially hazardous, as a new driver who has not yet mastered driving may panic and cause tragic accidents.

In Australia the legal age to get your learners is 16-17 in most states. During the course where you learn to drive you must complete hours of supervised learning by an instructor or another experience driver such as your parents. If the parents dont have enough time to 'supervise and assist them' are they very good parents? I mean, that is the role of a parent in general right? First of all, the main reason why the driving age is 16 17 in the UK is because parents don't have time to drive the teens around.

Do you seriously think that they would have time to supervise and assist them? It denies young people access to safe transportation It is a known fact that young adults often stay out late.

Without the ability to drive, they will have to resort an argument in favor of raising the minimum age for a driving license other means of transportation, most likely walking or public transit.

Most parents would probably not want their teenagers walking home alone late at night. Parents would prefer to get out of bed and pick their teenagers up than to know they were being driven home by immature drivers, who may well have been drinking.

Also, with the ability to drive, they would be encouraged to stay out late. Driving ability should be judged more - why not also a maximum age?! Yes, many young drivers have accidents due to inexperience, but doesn't that mean that maybe instead they need more experience rather than this chance being delayed?

Also, in the same way, a high propensity of older drivers have fatal accidents due to inability, despite extensive experience, so it is unfair to judge a group such as this based solely on one years difference in age. The bill, which drew a spirited debate amongst Senators from both parties, contains language that would require drivers age 75 and older to undergo a cognitive and physical abilities test in order to renew their license.

Section 4 of S2290: The applicant shall submit an elderly driving assessment form completed by the applicant's health care provider in the health care provider's professional capacity, and the applicant shall submit the assessment form to the registrar. The elderly driving assessment form shall assess the applicant's cognitive and physical ability, including a vision test, and any other condition that might prevent such applicant from operating a motor vehicle.

The elderly driving assessment form shall be developed by the registrar in consultation with the medical advisory board established in section 8C. An applicant for a license renewal shall complete the form upon the expiration of 60 months from attainment of the age of 75 years, and every 36 months thereafter. No license shall be issued until the registrar is satisfied that the applicant is a qualified person to receive it. No, lack of maturity. Young drivers cause the most crashes because of inexperience not lack of maturity.

No matter at what age people start driving, they will have accidents because they have little experience. This question only arises because young people are easy to blame. An adult who has just started to drive has as many crashes statistically as a young person. It is not ALL teens that are dangerous just a small percent.

In addition to that what if 18 year olds got their lisense at 16 wich totally disproves your point,when you said studies show that 16 year olds have more car crashes thent 18 year olds! Than wouldnt the brain of a 21 year old be more developed than an 18 year old's? And think about it but most of the hoons on the road are in their 20's not their teens. However, according to the brain researchers in the National Institute of Health, they have discovered that the executive branch of a teenage brain, which is the part that weighs risks, makes judgements, and controls impulsive behaviour, is not fully developed until after the teen years.

Therefore an 18-year-old driver would be more developed than a 16-year-old driver. Also, there are studies that show that 16-year-old have more car crashes than 18-year-olds. Driving age shouldn't be raised to 18 Teenagers may walk in less dangerous areas when going to school. Some teens may walk in the shadows of bad parents and may live in bad neighborhoods and can't do anything about it. You wouldn't want your child walking and then getting shot would you?

  • Is 16 the right age to get a driver's license?
  • After dark, an adult must accompany them;
  • In response to this concern, a bill has been introduced into the parliament to increase the minimum driver licensing age from 15 to 16 years;
  • Raising the driving age to 21 would be a much better idea.

Government can't tell parents how to raise their children. However, driving age is something that can be controlled.

  • Assumptions cannot me made over the general population of teens because of a tiny percentage of other teens who are irresponsible;
  • No fear I'm not one of those who looks back to my teenage days as unblemished by any stupid behaviour;
  • Should we penalize all teenagers for the mistakes of some?

Although we cannot prevent children from being shot, we can prevent them from getting into accidents. No 18 year olds are not more mature than their fellow teengers just because they have less peer pressure.

Some might be but that doesn't go for all, 18 year olds get the news that they're now adults by the government so ofcourse they will act all sophisticated to boost their young 'responsible adult' status but that's not always the case.

If you give younger teens a chance to drive then they would drive and some will even make sure not to accidentally run a red light but if they delay until 18 then more said 18 year olds won't bother driving because what would be the point other than location. In conclusion all I'm saying is that 15-17 are revved up to a new experience other than school work.

Should the Legal Driving Age Be Raised? 10 Points to Consider

It is not the maturiety that matters it is the responsibility of getting behind the wheel of a motorized vehical. If you go by the maturiety then the stakes will go for the girls, then the boys.

The rate of accident are higher in boys then girls.

  1. Both parents work, and he had to get himself from football practice to his job as a lifeguard.
  2. To grasp the complexity of the situation, here are the most prominent issues to consider. In conclusion all I'm saying is that 15-17 are revved up to a new experience other than school work.
  3. Crash-related deaths are lower there than in some nearby states.
  4. In this article we critically examine some of the arguments against raising the licensing age.

Ban men from driving? Likewise, it is illogical to raise the driving age because teenagers are harming or being harmed while driving more than others. Even though banning males would lower accidents, it would be sexist and even though women are normally the target of sexist remarks, there would still be strong resistance.

The assumption that teens lack maturity to drive is highly incorrect People have this overly assertive position against 16 year old drivers from driving and believe they should take the iniative to raise the legal age to start at 18. Assumptions cannot me made over the general population of teens because of a tiny percentage of other teens who are irresponsible.

A lack of maturity does not factor into these situations because learning to drive is gained by experience. As 18 year olds they are not obligated as drivers to have other requirements other than take the driver's test to obtain their licenses. Would you believe an 18 year old with no prior learning experience is more prepared than a 16 year old who has completed all the necessary requirements and above?

No matter what age you start driving, you will be inexperience. So you minds well start out at 16 where you are still in high school and are not going to college or start working. I'll gradutate high school at 17, so it would be nice to have a license before I graduate, so I dont have to worry about learning how to drive and take the test, when I am on my own. Plus, the only way to know how to drive in the winter, know the speed limit, where pot holes are, and how to handle sharp turns is to get out on the road and drive.