Term papers writing service


An argument in favor of allowing students to dress and play the way they want

In providing counter-arguments, we arm you with facts and information that you can use when you come up against those opposed to supporting the rights of girls to have appropriate options in their school uniform choices.

All arguments and rebuttals discussed below can be downloaded and printed here. You can then take this document with you to school meetings so that you are prepared if you find yourself facing anyone raising these arguments. While workplaces or other establishments might require a certain standard of dress, uniforms or dress codes must abide by anti-discrimination legislation.

A workplace uniform or dress code can not legally require a female to wear a dress or skirt. Women can choose to wear pants in all situations, even formal occasions.

  1. There are no complete and reliable figures on how many women in these countries q.
  2. The school needs to have a good amount of take-up on shorts and pants for girls to make the production costs to the school uniform supplier viable. Boys and girls at school gym dances check shoes outside to avoid marking gym floor.
  3. Research clearly shows that girls are disadvantaged by being required to wear a dress or a skirt.
  4. Sock hops are current craze in Oklahoma City. Often, we see that the uniform options for girls are significantly more expensive than the uniform options for boys.
  5. Girls wearing pants and shorts to school is not an issue about gender identity, it is an issue about discrimination and disadvantage. Students are graded on a scale of 1 to 4—with 25 considered personalized instruction that allows students to advance at their own students must also have input in determining how they will learn, choosing among opportunities such there are other education theorists who take this argument even.

Just like women, children should not have to dress in a way that restricts their ability to do what they need or want to do. They deserve to have a choice in what they wear, like we all do. We are not aware of a situation where, as a grown-up, we have to dress in a manner that is not appropriate for the work we need to engage in.

This is what we are currently asking some of our girls to do — to wear clothes that restrict their ability to run and play as they would like to, and that force them to expose their underwear in active play and when sitting cross-legged on the floor — often standard behaviours and requirements in schools. Wearing a dress can impact on learning time. In primary school classrooms, students often spend a good amount of their day on the floor, whether it be sitting and listening to a teacher reading a story, using Lego to help with counting, or programming and playing with robots during robotics.

Sitting on the floor in a dress or a skirt can be hard to do modestly. It is harder to engage in these activities when you are continually worried about flashing your underwear. In secondary school, learning is made more difficult when wearing skirts and dresses during agriculture, when out gardening, while sitting up on stools in science class, and in many other activities that occur for students during their school day, including the simple act of walking between classrooms.

Reaching to write on a board while wearing a skirt or dress is almost impossible to do modestly. We have heard from teachers who notice that girls are less inclined to volunteer to write on the board while wearing a dress or a skirt.

Playtime Isn’t Just for Preschoolers—Teenagers Need It, Too

Being cold in a dress can distract from learning, and tights do not afford the same warmth or comfort as pants. Another distraction from learning can be spending your precious learning time fretting that you may be flashing your underwear.

  • Furthermore, a range of suitable uniform options means that families can choose what they purchase, allowing them to factor the cost into their choice, if this is important in their circumstance;
  • We are not aware of a situation where, as a grown-up, we have to dress in a manner that is not appropriate for the work we need to engage in;
  • At faculty meeting Earl meets with his principal left and teachers and, as student representative, discusses school's plan to care for three French orphans;
  • To be sure, there are times to be serious in school;
  • The same could not be said for males wearing skirts and dresses;
  • Parents who ask for shorts and long pants to be added to the uniform for girls should be met with support and an agreement to work toward implementing their request.

While we have known for decades that a low level of physical activity is harmful to the health of Australian school children, more recent research is indicating that it is also harmful to academic outcomes. Health researchers now believe that children who are physically fitter have enhanced cognitive functioning, memoryconcentration, behaviour and academic achievement than those who are less active. While the Australian federal government spends millions of dollars attempting to coax children, and particularly girls into moving more, one simple and inexpensive solution could be found by changing what we make girls wear to school.

  • They have not reported that their school looks shabby;
  • Two Cleveland high schoolers at a record-playing meeting of a Frankie Laine fan club, 1948;
  • Statistics from the Australian Bureau of Statistics show that overall girls do significantly less physical activity than boys;
  • For inner city and suburban areas it is common for schools to be zoned and access to be denied unless in the zone;
  • The Reum greeting is flashed to a pair of girls on the sidewalk outside of school;
  • Charming the girls in drugstore after school, Earl makes trick necktie stick out.

As girls are the group least likely to engage in physical activity, and the only ones sitting around in skirts and dresses, a simple change of uniform to shorts and long pants may see a dramatic increase in the overall health of Australian girls. Further, such a change may lead to increases in academic outcomes for these children. The girls are running around and playing. The dress is not stopping them. Many girls say that wearing a dress does stop them from playing, doing exercise and having fun.

This has been documented anecdotally, and in a number of recent Australian studies. We should listen to girls, respect their voices, and believe them.

Arguments for and against allowing children to choose their own clothes

An Australian study showed that there IS a difference between boys and girls activity levels when a comparison is made between activity in sports uniforms, and activity in dresses for the girls.

Statistics from the Australian Bureau of Statistics show that overall girls do significantly less physical activity than boys. This activity level drops off more significantly at adolescence, which is a significant problem for the health and wellbeing of girls. Girls want to wear dresses. Some girls do want to wear dresses, and should be allowed to do so.

However, many girls do not want to wear dressesand they should be allowed to wear shorts and pants. We believe that children should be able to choose from a range of suitable options. Increased choice is what we are calling for. It will undermine our image.

Arguments for and against allowing children to choose their own clothes

Many schools offer girls options of skort, shorts, cullotes, pants, and dresses. They have not reported that their school looks shabby. Schools also monitor the wearing of the uniform to ensure students are complying with the dress code. In addition, where schools are reluctant to offer more options, they can simplify their uniform by allowing the sports uniform of shorts and polo shirt to become acceptable everyday wear for all students.

Adding shorts and long pants for girls will increase the cost for families. When unisex uniforms are available, and girls and boys wear the same shorts, for example, this allows a cost saving for families with children of both genders, as they can simply pass these items down.

Often, we see that the uniform options for girls are significantly more expensive than the uniform options for boys. Providing shorts and pants for girls may be one way of reducing the cost for families who have daughters, as winter pants usually cost significantly less than winter skirts, tunics, or dresses. Furthermore, a range of suitable uniform options means that families can choose what they purchase, allowing them to factor the cost into their choice, if this is important in their circumstance.

We must retain the formal dress as the an argument in favor of allowing students to dress and play the way they want uniform, as girls look smarter in dresses. A number of schools allow girls to wear shorts, pants and shirts as their formal uniform, and they look very smart in these. Boys in shorts and pants look smart in their uniforms, as do female teachers within the school that wear pants to work. Looking good should not be the primary message we send our girls.

It states that we place a higher value on what girls look like than their equity or what they are able to achieve, how they are able to move, and how they feel about themselves. Mary Barrythe CEO of Our Watch, the national organisation committed to eliminating violence against women and children, argues that continuing to enforce clothing restrictions on girls is one of the many ways they are reminded of their unequal status.

The school needs to have a good amount of take-up on shorts and pants for girls to make the production costs to the school uniform supplier viable. Further, many girls have noted anecdotally and via research that they want to wear shorts and pants to school. Some schools may need a cultural shift to occur for the uptake to be higher. There are plenty of companies that allow small orders of uniforms until such time that demand is increased.

Schools should embrace and promote the benefits of pants and shorts for girls whilst also allowing them the choice if they do prefer the dress. Parents who ask for shorts and long pants to be added to the uniform for girls should be met with support and an agreement to work toward implementing their request.

Where schools are not providing girls with the option of shorts and pants as part of their every day school uniform, they are discriminating against and disadvantaging girls. Consultation with the school community regarding school uniform does not mean consulting on the rights of girls, it means consulting on things like the style and colour of uniform options.

All families should have the option of choosing their local school as their school preference. For many families, they have bought a house close to this school so they can walk their children there.

As such, parents do not learn of the policy until they arrive to enrol at the school, by which time moving to a new school is not a simple process.

Playtime Isn’t Just for Preschoolers—Teenagers Need It, Too

All families should be able to choose their local school and know that their children will have access to a range of appropriate clothing options. For many families around the country it is not a simple process to change schools. Limited choice for rural families may mean there is no option to move elsewhere. For inner city and suburban areas it is common for schools to be zoned and access to be denied unless in the zone. The issue of access to shorts and pants for girls is spread across private, religious and public schools.

In some areas, a family can find that all schools around them DO NOT offer girls the choice of shorts and pants. In cases such as these, moving schools will not solve the problem. Further, children often have a range of support networks in the community and school that they are based. Parents are very reluctant to move their children to a new school and risk disrupting these supports for their children. Would we really expect that a child should have to start over at a new school because they want to wear a pair of shorts to school?

We would not expect this of a boy, as we would let him wear pants. But if the child is female, some schools refuse to accommodate her needs and would rather see her and her family leave.

Playtime Isn’t Just for Preschoolers—Teenagers Need It, Too

Ultimately why should one simple request, that girls at a school be able to wear shorts and pants, as they do in every other area of their lives, require a whole family to move schools? Research clearly shows that girls are disadvantaged by being required to wear a dress or a skirt. We are working to remove this disadvantage. Boys, already able to wear pants and shorts, are not disadvantaged in this way, and are therefore not part of this campaign. Modern cultural norms in Australia include females wearing shorts and pants whenever they choose.

An argument in favor of allowing students to dress and play the way they want

The same could not be said for males wearing skirts and dresses. If over time there was a cultural shift and boys and men wanted the choice to wear skirts and dresses, we would be supportive of this choice.

Playtime Isn’t Just for Preschoolers—Teenagers Need It, Too

Women and girls wear shorts and pants in society everywhere, including the workplace, often because they are practical. It is time that girls were given this option in schools. You are trying to make all children look the same, as if they have no gender. While some schools choose to have a unisex uniform that all students can wear, which ensures that girls are not disadvantaged, we do not advocate for all schools to have unisex uniforms if they do not want that.

Girls wearing pants and shorts to school is not an issue about gender identity, it is an issue about discrimination and disadvantage. Girls should not have to dress like boys in order to be able to participate in the same way as boys. You are raising brats who will be anti-authority. There is no evidence, or reason, indicating a choice between trousers and skirts increases the likelihood of children exhibiting anti-authority attitudes or behaviour.

To the contrary, comfort in school wear will enable children to focus more in lessons, fidget less, and be distracted less. Raising children who have a strong sense of justice and a commitment to equality is key to making positive gains in outcomes for women and girls in our society.

Raising children who believe they must always do as they are told will just maintain the status quo, and our society will never move forward. We all need to seek to change policies and practices that are unjust.

While schools maintain unjust policies that disadvantage girlswe will never reach a position where men and women are treated equally. We have a moral responsibility to stand against unjust policies. We believe that there is nothing brattish in requesting equality or equity — we support women voting, working, and having equal opportunity in play through childhood.

Ancedotal evidence does not trump methodical research on a topic.